Two roles of preferences in argumentation frameworks
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cites work
- A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
- A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
- Extending Argumentation to Make Good Decisions
- On Revising Argumentation-Based Decision Systems
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
- Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
- Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
Cited in
(17)- Corrigendum to: ``A general account of argumentation with preferences
- Simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation. II: Reasoning with preferences
- Revealed preference in argumentation: algorithms and applications
- Preference-based argumentation: arguments supporting multiple values
- Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks
- On the preferred extensions of argumentation frameworks: bijections with naive sets
- Integrating individual preferences into collective argumentation
- Property-based preferences in abstract argumentation
- A general account of argumentation with preferences
- Equivalence in logic-based argumentation
- Valued preference-based instantiation of argumentation frameworks with varied strength defeats
- Reduction-based approaches to implement Modgil's extended argumentation frameworks
- Preference in Abstract Argumentation
- Determining preferences over extensions: a cautious approach to preference-based argumentation frameworks
- A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
- Value-based argumentation framework built from prioritized qualitative choice logic
This page was built for publication: Two roles of preferences in argumentation frameworks
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3011937)