Preference in Abstract Argumentation
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
- Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
- Property-based preferences in abstract argumentation
- A general account of argumentation with preferences
- On the interaction between logic and preference in structured argumentation
- An Abstract Theory of Argumentation That Accommodates Defeasible Reasoning About Preferences
- Two roles of preferences in argumentation frameworks
- AI*IA 2005: Advances in Artificial Intelligence
Cited in
(15)- Preferred semantics as Socratic discussion
- A general account of argumentation with preferences
- Integrating user preferences into gradual bipolar argumentation for personalised decision support
- Simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation. II: Reasoning with preferences
- Credulous acceptance in high-order argumentation frameworks with necessities: an incremental approach
- Determining preferences over extensions: a cautious approach to preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation frameworks with preferences: partial orders and collective attacks
- Abstract argumentation frameworks with strong and weak constraints
- A review of the relations between logical argumentation and reasoning with maximal consistency
- The complexity landscape of claim-augmented argumentation frameworks
- Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
- New weak admissibility semantics for abstract argumentation
- Integrating individual preferences into collective argumentation
- The burden of persuasion in abstract argumentation
- Preference-based argumentation: arguments supporting multiple values
This page was built for publication: Preference in Abstract Argumentation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5215691)
