A review of the relations between logical argumentation and reasoning with maximal consistency
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2294581
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4174344 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 956466 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6934384 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1852916 (Why is no real title available?)
- A calculus of antinomics
- A general account of argumentation with preferences
- A generalized proof-theoretic approach to logical argumentation based on hypersequents
- A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
- A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
- ASPIC-END: structured argumentation with explanations and natural deduction
- An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
- Argument strength in formal argumentation
- Assumption-Based Argumentation for Epistemic and Practical Reasoning
- Beyond maxi-consistent argumentation operators
- Classical logic, argument and dialectic
- Deductive argumentation by enhanced sequent calculi and dynamic derivations
- Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
- Dialectic proof procedures for assumption-based, admissible argumentation
- Equipping sequent-based argumentation with defeasible assumptions
- How to reason defeasibly
- Hypersequent-based argumentation: an instantiation in the relevance logic RM
- Identifying the class of maxi-consistent operators in argumentation
- Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties
- Integration of weighted knowledge bases
- Logical argumentation by dynamic proof systems
- Logical limits of abstract argumentation frameworks
- Merging Information Under Constraints: A Logical Framework
- Non-monotonic inference properties for assumption-based argumentation
- Normative reasoning by sequent-based argumentation
- On inference from inconsistent premisses
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
- Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems
- Preference in Abstract Argumentation
- Preferences in artificial intelligence
- Reasoning about truth
- Reasoning with maximal consistency by argumentative approaches
- Sequent-based argumentation for normative reasoning
- Simple contrapositive assumption-based frameworks
- Skepticism relations for comparing argumentation semantics
- Some syntactic approaches to the handling of inconsistent knowledge bases: A comparative study. I: The flat case
- The logic of paradox
Cited in
(15)- A postulate-driven study of logical argumentation
- Maxi-consistent operators in argumentation
- Simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation. II: Reasoning with preferences
- Relations between assumption-based approaches in non-monotonic logic and formal argumentation: from structured argumentation to adaptive logics
- A generalized proof-theoretic approach to logical argumentation based on hypersequents
- Simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation frameworks
- Simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation frameworks with preferences: partial orders and collective attacks
- On minimality and consistency tolerance in logical argumentation frameworks
- An argumentative approach for handling inconsistency in prioritized Datalog ± ontologies
- Computing repairs under functional and inclusion dependencies via argumentation
- Logic-based approaches to formal argumentation
- Identifying the class of maxi-consistent operators in argumentation
- Investigating the relationship between argumentation semantics via signatures
- Reasoning with maximal consistency by argumentative approaches
- Knowledge representation, scientific argumentation and non-monotonic logic
This page was built for publication: A review of the relations between logical argumentation and reasoning with maximal consistency
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2294581)
