A general account of argumentation with preferences
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:360132)
Abstract: This paper builds on the recent ASPIC+ formalism, to develop a general framework for argumentation with preferences. We motivate a revised definition of conflict free sets of arguments, adapt ASPIC+ to accommodate a broader range of instantiating logics, and show that under some assumptions, the resulting framework satisfies key properties and rationality postulates. We then show that the generalised framework accommodates Tarskian logic instantiations extended with preferences, and then study instantiations of the framework by classical logic approaches to argumentation. We conclude by arguing that ASPIC+'s modelling of defeasible inference rules further testifies to the generality of the framework, and then examine and counter recent critiques of Dung's framework and its extensions to accommodate preferences.
Recommendations
- Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
- An Abstract Theory of Argumentation That Accommodates Defeasible Reasoning About Preferences
- Two roles of preferences in argumentation frameworks
- Preference in Abstract Argumentation
- On the interaction between logic and preference in structured argumentation
- Revealed preference in argumentation: algorithms and applications
- Corrigendum to: ``A general account of argumentation with preferences
- A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
Cited in
(66)- Reasoning in assumption-based argumentation using tree-decompositions
- Integrated preference argumentation and applications in consumer behaviour analyses
- Minimality, necessity and sufficiency for argumentation and explanation
- Reduction-based approaches to implement Modgil's extended argumentation frameworks
- The Jiminy advisor: moral agreements among stakeholders based on norms and argumentation
- A structured bipolar argumentation theory for providing explanations in practical reasoning
- When is argumentation deductive?
- An awareness epistemic framework for belief, argumentation and their dynamics
- A postulate-driven study of logical argumentation
- Weakest link in formal argumentation: lookahead and principle-based analysis
- Constrained derivation in assumption-based argumentation
- An Abstract Look at Awareness Models and Their Dynamics
- CONCILIATORY REASONING, SELF-DEFEAT, AND ABSTRACT ARGUMENTATION
- A multi attack argumentation framework
- Hierarchical Argumentation
- Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semantics
- An argumentation system for defeasible reasoning
- A two-phase method for extracting explanatory arguments from Bayesian networks
- Normality, non-contamination and logical depth in classical natural deduction
- Fundamental properties of attack relations in structured argumentation with priorities
- A comparative study of some central notions of \(\mathit{ASPIC}^+\) and \textit{DeLP}
- Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs
- A justification logic for argument evaluation
- Some reflections on two current trends in formal argumentation
- Towards a general framework for dialogues that accommodate reasoning about preferences
- Logical argumentation by dynamic proof systems
- Defeasible normative reasoning
- On the equivalence between logic programming semantics and argumentation semantics
- A characterization of types of support between structured arguments and their relationship with support in abstract argumentation
- On the graded acceptability of arguments in abstract and instantiated argumentation
- Corrigendum to: ``A general account of argumentation with preferences
- Revealed preference in argumentation: algorithms and applications
- An Abstract Theory of Argumentation That Accommodates Defeasible Reasoning About Preferences
- EMIL: extracting meaning from inconsistent language. Towards argumentation using a controlled natural language interface
- Arguing about constitutive and regulative norms
- Law and logic: a review from an argumentation perspective
- An axiomatic analysis of structured argumentation with priorities
- Semantic-based construction of arguments: an answer set programming approach
- Value-based argumentation framework built from prioritized qualitative choice logic
- Argument graphs and assumption-based argumentation
- Probabilistic abstract argumentation frameworks, a possible world view
- Correct grounded reasoning with presumptive arguments
- A Formalization of the Slippery Slope Argument
- Simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation. II: Reasoning with preferences
- Enabling reasoning with LegalRuleML
- Computational complexity of flat and generic assumption-based argumentation, with and without probabilities
- On the interaction between logic and preference in structured argumentation
- Argumentation for practical reasoning: an axiomatic approach
- Inference procedures and engine for probabilistic argumentation
- Labellings for assumption-based and abstract argumentation
- Logic-based argumentation with existential rules
- Connecting fuzzy logic and argumentation frames via logical attack principles
- Classical logic, argument and dialectic
- Simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation frameworks
- Preference in Abstract Argumentation
- Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Two roles of preferences in argumentation frameworks
- Assessing the epistemological relevance of Dung-style argumentation theories
- A review of the relations between logical argumentation and reasoning with maximal consistency
- Constrained Value-Based Argumentation Framework
- A paraconsistent approach to deal with epistemic inconsistencies in argumentation
- Base argumentation as an abstraction of deductive argumentation
- Towards a sound and complete dialogue system for handling enthymemes
- A general semi-structured formalism for computational argumentation: definition, properties, and examples of application
- Explaining Bayesian networks using argumentation
- Belief revision in structured probabilistic argumentation, model and application to cyber security
This page was built for publication: A general account of argumentation with preferences
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q360132)
