A general account of argumentation with preferences
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:360132)
Abstract: This paper builds on the recent ASPIC+ formalism, to develop a general framework for argumentation with preferences. We motivate a revised definition of conflict free sets of arguments, adapt ASPIC+ to accommodate a broader range of instantiating logics, and show that under some assumptions, the resulting framework satisfies key properties and rationality postulates. We then show that the generalised framework accommodates Tarskian logic instantiations extended with preferences, and then study instantiations of the framework by classical logic approaches to argumentation. We conclude by arguing that ASPIC+'s modelling of defeasible inference rules further testifies to the generality of the framework, and then examine and counter recent critiques of Dung's framework and its extensions to accommodate preferences.
Recommendations
- Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
- An Abstract Theory of Argumentation That Accommodates Defeasible Reasoning About Preferences
- Two roles of preferences in argumentation frameworks
- Preference in Abstract Argumentation
- On the interaction between logic and preference in structured argumentation
- Revealed preference in argumentation: algorithms and applications
- Corrigendum to: ``A general account of argumentation with preferences
- A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
Cited in
(66)- Argument graphs and assumption-based argumentation
- Defeasible normative reasoning
- Some reflections on two current trends in formal argumentation
- Reduction-based approaches to implement Modgil's extended argumentation frameworks
- A general semi-structured formalism for computational argumentation: definition, properties, and examples of application
- A multi attack argumentation framework
- Corrigendum to: ``A general account of argumentation with preferences
- Two roles of preferences in argumentation frameworks
- A postulate-driven study of logical argumentation
- Weakest link in formal argumentation: lookahead and principle-based analysis
- Normality, non-contamination and logical depth in classical natural deduction
- On the equivalence between logic programming semantics and argumentation semantics
- On the interaction between logic and preference in structured argumentation
- Computational complexity of flat and generic assumption-based argumentation, with and without probabilities
- A Formalization of the Slippery Slope Argument
- On the graded acceptability of arguments in abstract and instantiated argumentation
- Revealed preference in argumentation: algorithms and applications
- Simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation. II: Reasoning with preferences
- A comparative study of some central notions of \(\mathit{ASPIC}^+\) and \textit{DeLP}
- Constrained Value-Based Argumentation Framework
- Probabilistic abstract argumentation frameworks, a possible world view
- A characterization of types of support between structured arguments and their relationship with support in abstract argumentation
- Belief revision in structured probabilistic argumentation, model and application to cyber security
- Simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation frameworks
- CONCILIATORY REASONING, SELF-DEFEAT, AND ABSTRACT ARGUMENTATION
- Towards a general framework for dialogues that accommodate reasoning about preferences
- Logical argumentation by dynamic proof systems
- A review of the relations between logical argumentation and reasoning with maximal consistency
- Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs
- Arguing about constitutive and regulative norms
- A structured bipolar argumentation theory for providing explanations in practical reasoning
- When is argumentation deductive?
- An Abstract Theory of Argumentation That Accommodates Defeasible Reasoning About Preferences
- Correct grounded reasoning with presumptive arguments
- A paraconsistent approach to deal with epistemic inconsistencies in argumentation
- Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Explaining Bayesian networks using argumentation
- Law and logic: a review from an argumentation perspective
- An axiomatic analysis of structured argumentation with priorities
- Semantic-based construction of arguments: an answer set programming approach
- Value-based argumentation framework built from prioritized qualitative choice logic
- Constrained derivation in assumption-based argumentation
- Enabling reasoning with LegalRuleML
- An argumentation system for defeasible reasoning
- Inference procedures and engine for probabilistic argumentation
- Logic-based argumentation with existential rules
- An awareness epistemic framework for belief, argumentation and their dynamics
- Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semantics
- Labellings for assumption-based and abstract argumentation
- The Jiminy advisor: moral agreements among stakeholders based on norms and argumentation
- A two-phase method for extracting explanatory arguments from Bayesian networks
- Preference in Abstract Argumentation
- A justification logic for argument evaluation
- Hierarchical Argumentation
- EMIL: extracting meaning from inconsistent language. Towards argumentation using a controlled natural language interface
- Fundamental properties of attack relations in structured argumentation with priorities
- Base argumentation as an abstraction of deductive argumentation
- Towards a sound and complete dialogue system for handling enthymemes
- Argumentation for practical reasoning: an axiomatic approach
- Integrated preference argumentation and applications in consumer behaviour analyses
- Classical logic, argument and dialectic
- An Abstract Look at Awareness Models and Their Dynamics
- Connecting fuzzy logic and argumentation frames via logical attack principles
- Reasoning in assumption-based argumentation using tree-decompositions
- Minimality, necessity and sufficiency for argumentation and explanation
- Assessing the epistemological relevance of Dung-style argumentation theories
This page was built for publication: A general account of argumentation with preferences
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q360132)
