A general account of argumentation with preferences
From MaRDI portal
Publication:360132
DOI10.1016/j.artint.2012.10.008zbMath1270.68284arXiv1804.06763OpenAlexW2071122890MaRDI QIDQ360132
Publication date: 26 August 2013
Published in: Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.06763
Related Items (53)
A two-phase method for extracting explanatory arguments from Bayesian networks ⋮ Explaining Bayesian Networks Using Argumentation ⋮ A paraconsistent approach to deal with epistemic inconsistencies in argumentation ⋮ Argumentation for Practical Reasoning: An Axiomatic Approach ⋮ Labellings for assumption-based and abstract argumentation ⋮ An argumentation system for defeasible reasoning ⋮ Logic-based argumentation with existential rules ⋮ Inference procedures and engine for probabilistic argumentation ⋮ A Formalization of the Slippery Slope Argument ⋮ CONCILIATORY REASONING, SELF-DEFEAT, AND ABSTRACT ARGUMENTATION ⋮ When is argumentation deductive? ⋮ Simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation frameworks ⋮ Integrated preference argumentation and applications in consumer behaviour analyses ⋮ An Abstract Look at Awareness Models and Their Dynamics ⋮ Logical argumentation by dynamic proof systems ⋮ Fundamental properties of attack relations in structured argumentation with priorities ⋮ A postulate-driven study of logical argumentation ⋮ Law and logic: a review from an argumentation perspective ⋮ Weakest link in formal argumentation: lookahead and principle-based analysis ⋮ Semantic-based construction of arguments: an answer set programming approach ⋮ Value-based argumentation framework built from prioritized qualitative choice logic ⋮ An axiomatic analysis of structured argumentation with priorities ⋮ A structured bipolar argumentation theory for providing explanations in practical reasoning ⋮ Constrained Value-Based Argumentation Framework ⋮ A multi attack argumentation framework ⋮ Towards a sound and complete dialogue system for handling enthymemes ⋮ Base argumentation as an abstraction of deductive argumentation ⋮ Classical logic, argument and dialectic ⋮ Corrigendum to: ``A general account of argumentation with preferences ⋮ Revealed preference in argumentation: algorithms and applications ⋮ Computational complexity of flat and generic assumption-based argumentation, with and without probabilities ⋮ A characterization of types of support between structured arguments and their relationship with support in abstract argumentation ⋮ A general semi-structured formalism for computational argumentation: definition, properties, and examples of application ⋮ Belief revision in structured probabilistic argumentation, model and application to cyber security ⋮ Assessing the epistemological relevance of Dung-style argumentation theories ⋮ Reduction-Based Approaches to Implement Modgil’s Extended Argumentation Frameworks ⋮ Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs ⋮ Arguing about constitutive and regulative norms ⋮ Enabling reasoning with LegalRuleML ⋮ A Comparative Study of Some Central Notions of ASPIC+ and DeLP ⋮ A review of the relations between logical argumentation and reasoning with maximal consistency ⋮ EMIL: extracting meaning from inconsistent language. Towards argumentation using a controlled natural language interface ⋮ Probabilistic abstract argumentation frameworks, a possible world view ⋮ Defeasible normative reasoning ⋮ Normality, non-contamination and logical depth in classical natural deduction ⋮ Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semantics ⋮ Simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation. II: Reasoning with preferences ⋮ Connecting fuzzy logic and argumentation frames via logical attack principles ⋮ Correct Grounded Reasoning with Presumptive Arguments ⋮ On the graded acceptability of arguments in abstract and instantiated argumentation ⋮ On the equivalence between logic programming semantics and argumentation semantics ⋮ Argument graphs and assumption-based argumentation ⋮ Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks
This page was built for publication: A general account of argumentation with preferences
