Law and logic: a review from an argumentation perspective

Cites Work

Title not available (Why is that?)
Title not available (Why is that?)
Title not available (Why is that?)
Title not available (Why is that?)
Title not available (Why is that?)
Title not available (Why is that?)
Title not available (Why is that?)
Title not available (Why is that?)
Title not available (Why is that?)
Title not available (Why is that?)
Title not available (Why is that?)
Title not available (Why is that?)
Title not available (Why is that?)
Title not available (Why is that?)
On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
A general account of argumentation with preferences
A logic-based calculus of events
Deontic epistemic stit logic distinguishing modes of mens rea
A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
Coherence and Flexibility in Dialogue Games for Argumentation
Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
An Analysis of some Deontic Logics
Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
Conditional entailment: bridging two approaches to default reasoning.
Input/output logics
On the resolution-based family of abstract argumentation semantics and its grounded instance
Dynamic argument systems: A formal model of argumentation processes based on situation calculus
Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systems
Belief revision and epistemology
A different approach to deontic logic: Deontic logic viewed as a variant of dynamic logic
Changing legal systems: legal abrogations and annulments in Defeasible Logic
The carneades model of argument and burden of proof
Introducing the Logic and Law Corner
DefLog: on the Logical Interpretation of Prima Facie Justified Assumptions
Stratification of normative systems with intermediaries
The many faces of counts-as: A formal analysis of constitutive rules
A computational theory of normative positions
Question-begging in non-cumulative systems
Two approaches to the formalisation of defeasible deontic reasoning
A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values
Using background knowledge in case-based legal reasoning: A computational model and an intelligent learning environment
An executable specification of a formal argumentation protocol
Computing strong and weak permissions in defeasible logic
Hierarchical representation of legal knowledge with metaprogramming in logic

Cited In (13)

Title not available (Why is that?)
Changing legal systems: legal abrogations and annulments in Defeasible Logic
Neighborhood-based argumental community support in the context of multi-topic debates
Modelling last-act attempted crime in criminal law
Hybrid Reasoning on a Bipolar Argumentation Framework
Towards Evidence Retrieval Cost Reduction in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks with Fallible Evidence
Reduced meet over labelling-based semantics in abstract argumentation
A logic for the interpretation of private international law
A comprehensive study of argumentation frameworks with sets of attacking arguments
A general approach to extension-based semantics in abstract argumentation
Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations
Graded labellings for abstract argumentation
Stable normative explanations: from argumentation to deontic logic

This page was built for publication: Law and logic: a review from an argumentation perspective

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q899166)