Law and logic: a review from an argumentation perspective
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:899166)
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4135904 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 588315 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1163374 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1948207 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1749193 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 928022 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1405873 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3314318 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3365184 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3392411 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2243367 (Why is no real title available?)
- A computational theory of normative positions
- A different approach to deontic logic: Deontic logic viewed as a variant of dynamic logic
- A general account of argumentation with preferences
- A logic-based calculus of events
- A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
- A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values
- Agency and deontic logic
- An Analysis of some Deontic Logics
- An executable specification of a formal argumentation protocol
- Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
- Belief revision and epistemology
- Changing legal systems: legal abrogations and annulments in Defeasible Logic
- Coherence and Flexibility in Dialogue Games for Argumentation
- Computational models of argument. Proceedings of the 4th conference, COMMA 2012, Vienna, Austria, September 10--12, 2012
- Computing strong and weak permissions in defeasible logic
- Conditional entailment: bridging two approaches to default reasoning.
- DefLog: on the Logical Interpretation of Prima Facie Justified Assumptions
- Deontic epistemic stit logic distinguishing modes of mens rea
- Dynamic argument systems: A formal model of argumentation processes based on situation calculus
- Hierarchical representation of legal knowledge with metaprogramming in logic
- Input/output logics
- Introducing the Logic and Law Corner
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
- On the resolution-based family of abstract argumentation semantics and its grounded instance
- Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
- Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systems
- Question-begging in non-cumulative systems
- Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
- Stratification of normative systems with intermediaries
- The carneades model of argument and burden of proof
- The many faces of counts-as: A formal analysis of constitutive rules
- Two approaches to the formalisation of defeasible deontic reasoning
- Using background knowledge in case-based legal reasoning: A computational model and an intelligent learning environment
- What does it take to enforce an argument? Minimal change in abstract argumentation
Cited in
(27)- SELECT TOPICS IN LEGAL EVIDENCE AND ASSISTANCE BY ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNIQUES
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7593562 (Why is no real title available?)
- Changing legal systems: legal abrogations and annulments in Defeasible Logic
- Modelling last-act attempted crime in criminal law
- Neighborhood-based argumental community support in the context of multi-topic debates
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4114593 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1973877 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7659877 (Why is no real title available?)
- A logical model of private international law
- Towards Evidence Retrieval Cost Reduction in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks with Fallible Evidence
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1926643 (Why is no real title available?)
- Reduced meet over labelling-based semantics in abstract argumentation
- Goal-based theory evaluation
- A neural cognitive model of argumentation with application to legal inference and decision making
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2236622 (Why is no real title available?)
- A comprehensive study of argumentation frameworks with sets of attacking arguments
- A general approach to extension-based semantics in abstract argumentation
- A logic for the interpretation of private international law
- Logic programming and burden of proof in legal reasoning
- Past and present interactions in legal reasoning and logic
- Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations
- Logic in law: a concise overview
- Formal philosophy and legal reasoning the validity of legal inferences
- Introducing the Logic and Law Corner
- Graded labellings for abstract argumentation
- Hybrid reasoning on a bipolar argumentation framework
- Stable normative explanations: from argumentation to deontic logic
This page was built for publication: Law and logic: a review from an argumentation perspective
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q899166)
