Validity of attacks related to argument set in higher-order argumentation frameworks

DOI10.1007/978-981-96-7956-0_9MaRDI QIDQ6877240zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Hengfei Li, Jiachao Wu

Publication date 8 January 2026

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-7956-0_9

zbMATH Keywords

credulous attitudehigher order attackshigher-order argumentation frameworkssceptical attitudevalidity of attacks

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Cites work

• A characterization of types of support between structured arguments and their relationship with support in abstract argumentation
• A probabilistic deontic argumentation framework
• Abstract argumentation and the rational man
• AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks
• Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding
• Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semantics
• Gödel semantics of fuzzy argumentation frameworks with consistency degrees
• Inductive defense for sceptical semantics of extended argumentation
• Law and logic: a review from an argumentation perspective
• Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
• Probabilistic abstract argumentation frameworks, a possible world view
• Proximity semantics for topic-based abstract argumentation
• Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
• Semantics for higher level attacks in extended argumentation frames. I: Overview
• Valid attacks in argumentation frameworks with recursive attacks
• Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results

This page was built for publication: Validity of attacks related to argument set in higher-order argumentation frameworks

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6877240)