Abstract argumentation and the rational man

DOI10.1093/LOGCOM/EXAB003MaRDI QIDQ5858138zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Timotheus Kampik, Juan Carlos Nieves

Publication date 9 April 2021

Published in Journal Of Logic And Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)

Copyright license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.13024

zbMATH Keywords

economic rationalityformal argumentationnon-monotonic reasoning

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Mathematical logic and foundations (03-XX) Computer science (68-XX)

Recommendations

• Abstract and concrete decision graphs for choosing extensions of argumentation frameworks
• An Abstract Theory of Argumentation That Accommodates Defeasible Reasoning About Preferences
• Abstract argumentation in artificial intelligence: problems of interpretation and suitability of semantics in decision making
• Rationalisation of profiles of abstract argumentation frameworks: characterisation and complexity
• Extending Argumentation to Make Good Decisions

Cited in

(10)

• Ensuring reference independence and cautious monotony in abstract argumentation
• The degrees of monotony-dilemma in abstract argumentation
• Explanations of non-monotonic inference in admissibility-based abstract argumentation
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7686232 (Why is no real title available?)
• CONCILIATORY REASONING, SELF-DEFEAT, AND ABSTRACT ARGUMENTATION
• Integrated preference argumentation and applications in consumer behaviour analyses
• Validity of attacks related to argument set in higher-order argumentation frameworks
• A credulous semantics of higher-order argumentation frameworks based on credulously accepted attacks
• Renovation sets and their applications in higher-order argumentation frameworks
• Kettle logic in abstract argumentation

This page was built for publication: Abstract argumentation and the rational man

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5858138)