Ensuring reference independence and cautious monotony in abstract argumentation

DOI10.1016/J.IJAR.2021.10.007MaRDI QIDQ2069060zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Timotheus Kampik, Juan Carlos Nieves, Dov Gabbay

Publication date 20 January 2022

Published in International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)

Copyright license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2021.10.007

zbMATH Keywords

abstract argumentationeconomic rationalitynon-monotonic reasoning

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37)

Cites work

• Abstract argumentation and the rational man
• Computing ideal sceptical argumentation
• Context-free and context-sensitive kernels: update and deletion equivalence in abstract argumentation
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3930376 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 741348 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1748069 (Why is no real title available?)
• If nothing is accepted -- repairing argumentation frameworks
• Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
• On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
• On Revising Argumentation-Based Decision Systems
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
• Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
• Range-based argumentation semantics as two-valued models
• SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
• Semi-stable semantics
• Stage semantics and the SCC-recursive schema for argumentation semantics
• What does it take to enforce an argument? Minimal change in abstract argumentation

Cited in

(3)

• Integrated preference argumentation and applications in consumer behaviour analyses
• Kettle logic in abstract argumentation
• Logemes as a new approach to metalogic

Describes a project that uses

Uses Software

• Tweety
• DiArg

This page was built for publication: Ensuring reference independence and cautious monotony in abstract argumentation

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2069060)