Ensuring reference independence and cautious monotony in abstract argumentation

DOI10.1016/j.ijar.2021.10.007OpenAlexW3209345124MaRDI QIDQ2069060

Juan Carlos Nieves, Timotheus Kampik, Dov M. Gabbay

Publication date: 20 January 2022

Published in: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2021.10.007

zbMATH Keywords

non-monotonic reasoningabstract argumentationeconomic rationality

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37)

Related Items

Integrated preference argumentation and applications in consumer behaviour analyses

Uses Software

• Tweety
• DiArg

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Computing ideal sceptical argumentation
• On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
• SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
• Stage semantics and the SCC-recursive schema for argumentation semantics
• Semi-stable semantics
• On Revising Argumentation-Based Decision Systems
• Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
• Range-based argumentation semantics as two-valued models
• If Nothing Is Accepted -- Repairing Argumentation Frameworks
• Abstract argumentation and the rational man

This page was built for publication: Ensuring reference independence and cautious monotony in abstract argumentation