Valid attacks in argumentation frameworks with recursive attacks
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2029707
DOI10.1007/s10472-020-09693-4OpenAlexW3104191106MaRDI QIDQ2029707
Claudette Cayrol, Luis Fariñas del Cerro, Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex, Jorge Fandinno
Publication date: 4 June 2021
Published in: Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/19185/1/cayrol_19185.pdf
Related Items (1)
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks
- Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
- An approach to abstract argumentation with recursive attack and support
- Computational properties of argument systems satisfying graph-theoretic constraints
- A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
- Argumentation frameworks with recursive attacks and evidence-based supports
- Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations
- Coherence in finite argument systems.
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation
- Semantics for higher level attacks in extended argumentation frames. I: Overview
- Inductive Defense for Sceptical Semantics of Extended Argumentation
- Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning
This page was built for publication: Valid attacks in argumentation frameworks with recursive attacks
