A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values

DOI10.1016/S0004-3702(03)00108-5zbMATH Open1082.68796OpenAlexW2024318497WikidataQ58168615 ScholiaQ58168615MaRDI QIDQ814518FDOQ814518

Giovanni Sartor, Trevor Bench-Capon

Publication date: 7 February 2006

Published in: Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0004-3702(03)00108-5

zbMATH Keywords

Case-based reasoningLegal reasoningTheory construction

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Problem solving in the context of artificial intelligence (heuristics, search strategies, etc.) (68T20)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• The well-founded semantics for general logic programs
• Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
• An exercise in formalising teleological case-based reasoning
• Goal-based theory evaluation
• Using values and theories to resolve disagreement in law
• New reasoning patterns in analogical legal case-based reasoning: An informal investigation

Cited In (6)

• A simple test of a simple legal model. Evidence from the Dutch Supreme Court 2013--2018
• On searching explanatory argumentation graphs
• Explanation in AI and law: past, present and future
• Law and logic: a review from an argumentation perspective
• Explainable AI tools for legal reasoning about cases: a study on the European court of human rights
• Computational representation of practical argument

This page was built for publication: A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q814518)