A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values

DOI10.1016/S0004-3702(03)00108-5zbMATH Open1082.68796OpenAlexW2024318497WikidataQ58168615 ScholiaQ58168615MaRDI QIDQ814518FDOQ814518

Authors: Giovanni Sartor, Trevor Bench-Capon 

Publication date: 7 February 2006

Published in: Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0004-3702(03)00108-5

Recommendations

• An exercise in formalising teleological case-based reasoning
• Using values and theories to resolve disagreement in law
• New reasoning patterns in analogical legal case-based reasoning: An informal investigation
• A formalization of argumentation schemes for legal case-based reasoning in ASPIC+
• Persuasion and Value in Legal Argument

zbMATH Keywords

Case-based reasoningLegal reasoningTheory construction

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Problem solving in the context of artificial intelligence (heuristics, search strategies, etc.) (68T20)

Cites Work

• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• The well-founded semantics for general logic programs
• Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
• An exercise in formalising teleological case-based reasoning
• Goal-based theory evaluation
• Using values and theories to resolve disagreement in law
• New reasoning patterns in analogical legal case-based reasoning: An informal investigation
• Title not available (Why is that?)

Cited In (22)

• A simple test of a simple legal model. Evidence from the Dutch Supreme Court 2013--2018
• Modelling last-act attempted crime in criminal law
• Finding factors in legal case-based reasoning
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• An exercise in formalising teleological case-based reasoning
• Goal-based theory evaluation
• New reasoning patterns in analogical legal case-based reasoning: An informal investigation
• Using values and theories to resolve disagreement in law
• On searching explanatory argumentation graphs
• A formal model for analogies in civil law reasoning
• Explanation in AI and law: past, present and future
• Law and logic: a review from an argumentation perspective
• Automated inference of rules with exception from past legal cases using ASP
• Explainable AI tools for legal reasoning about cases: a study on the European court of human rights
• Computational representation of practical argument
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• A formalization of argumentation schemes for legal case-based reasoning in ASPIC+
• A reduction-graph model of precedent in legal analysis
• Extensionally defining principles and cases in ethics: an AI model
• Law, learning and representation
• Norm change in the common law

This page was built for publication: A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q814518)