Persuasion and Value in Legal Argument
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3371157
DOI10.1093/logcom/exi058zbMath1113.03025OpenAlexW1982993548WikidataQ58168607 ScholiaQ58168607MaRDI QIDQ3371157
Katie Atkinson, Alison Chorley, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon
Publication date: 21 February 2006
Published in: Journal of Logic and Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://semanticscholar.org/paper/da67e383740455b188e952e04400473232155e18
practical reasoningargumentation frameworkslegal reasoningargumentation schemescritical questionslegal theory construction
Related Items (9)
A Formalization of the Slippery Slope Argument ⋮ A claim-centric perspective on abstract argumentation semantics: claim-defeat, principles, and expressiveness ⋮ Taking account of the actions of others in value-based reasoning ⋮ Value-based argumentation framework built from prioritized qualitative choice logic ⋮ Constrained Value-Based Argumentation Framework ⋮ A formal account of Socratic-style argumentation ⋮ Explanation in AI and law: past, present and future ⋮ Audiences in argumentation frameworks ⋮ Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systems
This page was built for publication: Persuasion and Value in Legal Argument