Some reflections on two current trends in formal argumentation

DOI10.1007/978-3-642-29414-3_14zbMATH Open1356.68222OpenAlexW1951907177MaRDI QIDQ2900481FDOQ2900481

Authors Henry Prakken

Publication date 23 July 2012

Published in Logic Programs, Norms and Action (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29414-3_14

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Knowledge representation (68T30) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Recommendations

• A general account of argumentation with preferences
• Corrigendum to: ``A general account of argumentation with preferences
• An Abstract Theory of Argumentation That Accommodates Defeasible Reasoning About Preferences
• Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
• Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks

Cited in

(6)

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3843676 (Why is no real title available?)
• Algorithms for decision problems in argument systems under preferred semantics
• Five weaknesses of ASPIC\(^+\)
• Two aspects of relevance in structured argumentation: minimality and paraconsistency
• A postulate-driven study of logical argumentation
• A general semi-structured formalism for computational argumentation: definition, properties, and examples of application

Describes a project that uses

Uses Software

• Aspic

This page was built for publication: Some reflections on two current trends in formal argumentation

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2900481)