Some reflections on two current trends in formal argumentation

DOI10.1007/978-3-642-29414-3_14zbMATH Open1356.68222OpenAlexW1951907177MaRDI QIDQ2900481FDOQ2900481

Authors: Henry Prakken 

Publication date: 23 July 2012

Published in: Logic Programs, Norms and Action (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29414-3_14

Recommendations

• A general account of argumentation with preferences
• Corrigendum to: ``A general account of argumentation with preferences
• An Abstract Theory of Argumentation That Accommodates Defeasible Reasoning About Preferences
• Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
• Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Knowledge representation (68T30) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Cited In (6)

• A general semi-structured formalism for computational argumentation: definition, properties, and examples of application
• A postulate-driven study of logical argumentation
• Five weaknesses of ASPIC\(^+\)
• Two aspects of relevance in structured argumentation: minimality and paraconsistency
• Algorithms for decision problems in argument systems under preferred semantics
• Title not available (Why is that?)

Uses Software

• Aspic

This page was built for publication: Some reflections on two current trends in formal argumentation

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2900481)