Minimality, necessity and sufficiency for argumentation and explanation
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6548459
DOI10.1016/J.IJAR.2024.109143MaRDI QIDQ6548459FDOQ6548459
Publication date: 1 June 2024
Published in: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)
formal argumentationAI and lawexplainable artificial intelligencestructured argumentation frameworks
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Argumentation in artificial intelligence
- An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- A general account of argumentation with preferences
- Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
- Dynamics in Argumentation with Single Extensions: Abstraction Principles and the Grounded Extension
- On strongest necessary and weakest sufficient conditions
- Logics in Artificial Intelligence
- Explanation Semantics for Abstract Argumentation
- Explanation in artificial intelligence: insights from the social sciences
- On Explanations for Non-Acceptable Arguments
- From fine-grained properties to broad principles for gradual argumentation: a principled spectrum
- Explanation in AI and law: past, present and future
- Abstraction in argumentation: necessary but dangerous
- Necessary and sufficient explanations for argumentation-based conclusions
- Argumentative explanations for interactive recommendations
- Interpretability of gradual semantics in abstract argumentation
- Change in quantitative bipolar argumentation: sufficient, necessary, and counterfactual explanations
This page was built for publication: Minimality, necessity and sufficiency for argumentation and explanation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6548459)
