Minimality, necessity and sufficiency for argumentation and explanation
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6548459
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6934384 (Why is no real title available?)
- A general account of argumentation with preferences
- Abstraction in argumentation: necessary but dangerous
- An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
- Argumentation in artificial intelligence
- Argumentative explanations for interactive recommendations
- Change in quantitative bipolar argumentation: sufficient, necessary, and counterfactual explanations
- Computational models of argument. Proceedings of the 4th conference, COMMA 2012, Vienna, Austria, September 10--12, 2012
- Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
- Dynamics in Argumentation with Single Extensions: Abstraction Principles and the Grounded Extension
- Explaining non-acceptability in abstract argumentation
- Explanation in AI and law: past, present and future
- Explanation in artificial intelligence: insights from the social sciences
- Explanation semantics for abstract argumentation
- From fine-grained properties to broad principles for gradual argumentation: a principled spectrum
- Interpretability of gradual semantics in abstract argumentation
- Logics in Artificial Intelligence
- Minimal strong admissibility: a complexity analysis
- Necessary and sufficient explanations for argumentation-based conclusions
- On explanations for non-acceptable arguments
- On strongest necessary and weakest sufficient conditions
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
Cited in
(1)
This page was built for publication: Minimality, necessity and sufficiency for argumentation and explanation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6548459)
