An argumentation system for defeasible reasoning
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2409094
DOI10.1016/j.ijar.2017.02.009zbMath1419.68104OpenAlexW2592011991MaRDI QIDQ2409094
Publication date: 11 October 2017
Published in: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2017.02.009
Related Items
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- A general account of argumentation with preferences
- Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems
- Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
- A logic for default reasoning
- How to reason defeasibly
- An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
- On the equivalence between logic programming semantics and argumentation semantics
- On inference from inconsistent premisses
- On the Instantiation of Knowledge Bases in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
- Instantiating Knowledge Bases in Abstract Dialectical Frameworks
- What Are the Necessity Rules in Defeasible Reasoning?
- Backing and Undercutting in Defeasible Logic Programming
- Monotonic Answer Set Programming
- Logical limits of abstract argumentation frameworks
- Argumentation Semantics for Defeasible Logic
- Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
- On the Equivalence between Logic Programming Semantics and Argumentation Semantics
- An argument-based approach to reasoning with specificity
