Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
- Closure and consistency rationalities in logic-based argumentation
- Argumentative logics: Reasoning with classically inconsistent information
- Logical limits of abstract argumentation frameworks
- Sets of attacking arguments for inconsistent Datalog knowledge bases
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
Cites work
- A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
- A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
- A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
- A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
- Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
- Argumentation Semantics for Defeasible Logic
- Argumentation-based reinforcement learning for RoboCup soccer Keepaway
- Change in abstract argumentation frameworks: adding an argument
- Computing ideal sceptical argumentation
- Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
- How to reason defeasibly
- Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
- Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
- Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
- SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
- Towards a Formal Framework for the Search of a Consensus Between Autonomous Agents
- Using arguments for making and explaining decisions
- Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results
Cited in
(25)- A general semi-structured formalism for computational argumentation: definition, properties, and examples of application
- A postulate-driven study of logical argumentation
- Revealed preference in argumentation: algorithms and applications
- Sets of attacking arguments for inconsistent Datalog knowledge bases
- A generalized proof-theoretic approach to logical argumentation based on hypersequents
- A review of the relations between logical argumentation and reasoning with maximal consistency
- Correct grounded reasoning with presumptive arguments
- Closure and consistency rationalities in logic-based argumentation
- A claim-centric perspective on abstract argumentation semantics: claim-defeat, principles, and expressiveness
- Logical limits of abstract argumentation frameworks
- An axiomatic analysis of structured argumentation with priorities
- An argumentative approach for handling inconsistency in prioritized Datalog ± ontologies
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
- An argumentation system for defeasible reasoning
- Logic-based argumentation with existential rules
- Opposition Frameworks
- Preference-based extension enforcement in argumentation
- An argumentation system for reasoning with LPm
- Closure and consistency in logic-associated argumentation
- Fundamental properties of attack relations in structured argumentation with priorities
- On argumentation logic and propositional logic
- Attack principles in sequent-based argumentation theory
- Base argumentation as an abstraction of deductive argumentation
- Argumentation for practical reasoning: an axiomatic approach
- Integrated preference argumentation and applications in consumer behaviour analyses
This page was built for publication: Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q465599)
