Sets of attacking arguments for inconsistent Datalog knowledge bases

DOI10.3233/FAIA200526MaRDI QIDQ5145824zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Bruno Yun, Srdjan Vesic, Madalina Croitoru

Publication date 21 January 2021

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA200526

zbMATH Keywords

argumentationDatalogSETAF

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Knowledge representation (68T30)

Recommendations

• Logic-based argumentation with existential rules
• Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
• Generalized Abstract Argumentation: Handling Arguments in FOL Fragments
• Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems
• Logical limits of abstract argumentation frameworks

Cited in

(11)

• Logic-based argumentation with existential rules
• Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
• Repairing non-monotonic knowledge bases
• What can argumentation do for inconsistent ontology query answering?
• Generalized Abstract Argumentation: Handling Arguments in FOL Fragments
• An approach to generating arguments over DL-Lite ontologies
• Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems
• Sceptical and credulous approach to deductive argumentation
• An argumentative approach for handling inconsistency in prioritized Datalog ± ontologies
• On minimality and consistency tolerance in logical argumentation frameworks
• Computing repairs under functional and inclusion dependencies via argumentation

This page was built for publication: Sets of attacking arguments for inconsistent Datalog knowledge bases

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5145824)