Change in abstract argumentation frameworks: adding an argument
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: In this paper, we address the problem of change in an abstract argumentation system. We focus on a particular change: the addition of a new argument which interacts with previous arguments. We study the impact of such an addition on the outcome of the argumentation system, more particularly on the set of its extensions. Several properties for this change operation are defined by comparing the new set of extensions to the initial one, these properties are called structural when the comparisons are based on set-cardinality or set-inclusion relations. Several other properties are proposed where comparisons are based on the status of some particular arguments: the accepted arguments; these properties refer to the evolution of this status during the change, e.g., Monotony and Priority to Recency. All these properties may be more or less desirable according to specific applications. They are studied under two particular semantics: the grounded and preferred semantics.
Recommendations
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6292806
- Semantic change and extension enforcement in abstract argumentation
- Persistence and monotony properties of argumentation semantics
- What does it take to enforce an argument? Minimal change in abstract argumentation
- Incremental computation of deterministic extensions for dynamic argumentation frameworks
Cited in
(67)- On the responsibility for undecisiveness in preferred and stable labellings in abstract argumentation
- An extension-based approach to belief revision in abstract argumentation
- Empirical evaluation of abstract argumentation: supporting the need for bipolar and probabilistic approaches
- A characterization of types of support between structured arguments and their relationship with support in abstract argumentation
- Stratified belief bases revision with argumentative inference
- Introducing a tool for concurrent argumentation
- Acceptance in incomplete argumentation frameworks
- Incremental computation for structured argumentation over dynamic DeLP knowledge bases
- Using argument strength for building dialectical bonsai
- Preservation of semantic properties in collective argumentation: the case of aggregating abstract argumentation frameworks
- Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation -- a survey
- Blockage contraction
- Explanations of non-monotonic inference in admissibility-based abstract argumentation
- How can you resolve a trilemma? A topological approach
- Toward a computational analysis of probabilistic argumentation frameworks
- Persistence and monotony properties of argumentation semantics
- A study of argument acceptability dynamics through core and remainder sets
- Incremental computation of deterministic extensions for dynamic argumentation frameworks
- Spectra in Abstract Argumentation: An Analysis of Minimal Change
- Rewriting rules for the computation of goal-oriented changes in an argumentation system
- Property-based preferences in abstract argumentation
- Argumentation update in YALLA (yet another logic language for argumentation)
- A translation-based approach for revision of argumentation frameworks
- Duality between addition and removal
- Optimization of dialectical outcomes in dialogical argumentation
- Hybrid reasoning on a bipolar argumentation framework
- Structural Analysis of Extension-Based Argumentation Semantics with Joint Acceptability
- Local Expansion Invariant Operators in Argumentation Semantics
- Updating Argumentation Frameworks for Enforcing Extensions
- Abstract Argumentation in Dynamic Logic: Representation, Reasoning and Change
- Computational Hermeneutics: An Integrated Approach for the Logical Analysis of Natural-Language Arguments
- What does it take to enforce an argument? Minimal change in abstract argumentation
- On Revising Argumentation-Based Decision Systems
- Dynamics in Argumentation with Single Extensions: Abstraction Principles and the Grounded Extension
- Characterizing strong equivalence for argumentation frameworks
- Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems
- Abduction in argumentation frameworks
- Initial sets in abstract argumentation frameworks
- Probabilistic argumentation: an equational approach
- Semantic change and extension enforcement in abstract argumentation
- Computer-supported analysis of arguments in climate engineering
- Dynamics of Fuzzy Argumentation Frameworks
- Open problems in abstract argumentation
- Structural constraints for dynamic operators in abstract argumentation
- Assessing the epistemological relevance of Dung-style argumentation theories
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6292806 (Why is no real title available?)
- A claim-centric perspective on abstract argumentation semantics: claim-defeat, principles, and expressiveness
- Belief revision and computational argumentation: a critical comparison
- Dynamic epistemic logics for abstract argumentation
- Theoretical analysis and implementation of abstract argumentation frameworks with domain assignments
- Topological conditions and solutions for repairing argumentation frameworks
- On dynamics in structured argumentation formalisms
- Equivalence in argumentation frameworks with a claim-centric view: classical results with novel ingredients
- Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method
- A principle-based analysis of bipolar argumentation semantics
- Change in quantitative bipolar argumentation: sufficient, necessary, and counterfactual explanations
- Credulous acceptance in high-order argumentation frameworks with necessities: an incremental approach
- Dynamic collective argumentation: constructing the revision and contraction operators
- Reasoning about action and change
- Verification in incomplete argumentation frameworks
- Investigation of semantic behavior in probabilistic argumentation
- Necessary and sufficient conditions of the enforcement problem for various argumentation semantics
- Argumentative reasoning in ASPIC^+ under incomplete information
- ICCMA 2023: 5th international competition on computational models of argumentation
- Kettle logic in abstract argumentation
- Logic of justified beliefs based on argumentation
- Conflict-free and conflict-tolerant semantics for constrained argumentation frameworks
This page was built for publication: Change in abstract argumentation frameworks: adding an argument
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3563096)
