Updating Argumentation Frameworks for Enforcing Extensions

DOI10.1007/978-981-13-7791-4_4MaRDI QIDQ3305688zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Kang Xu, Beishui Liao, Huaxin Huang

Publication date 10 August 2020

Published in Dynamics, Uncertainty and Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7791-4_4

zbMATH Keywords

argumentation frameworksenforcementupdating

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7599964
• Semantic change and extension enforcement in abstract argumentation
• What does it take to enforce an argument? Minimal change in abstract argumentation
• Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method
• Incremental computation of deterministic extensions for dynamic argumentation frameworks

Cites work

• Change in abstract argumentation frameworks: adding an argument
• Characterizing strong equivalence for argumentation frameworks
• Coherence in finite argument systems.
• Dynamics in Argumentation with Single Extensions: Abstraction Principles and the Grounded Extension
• Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method
• Formulating semantics of probabilistic argumentation by characterizing subgraphs: theory and empirical results
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6292806 (Why is no real title available?)
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
• What does it take to enforce an argument? Minimal change in abstract argumentation

Cited in

(1)

• On dynamics in structured argumentation formalisms

This page was built for publication: Updating Argumentation Frameworks for Enforcing Extensions

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3305688)