A principle-based analysis of bipolar argumentation semantics
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6545533
Recommendations
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Capturing bipolar argumentation in non-flat assumption-based argumentation
- On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
- Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding
- Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6934384 (Why is no real title available?)
- An axiomatic approach to support in argumentation
- Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding
- Change in abstract argumentation frameworks: adding an argument
- Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs
- Handling support cycles and collective interactions in the logical encoding of higher-order bipolar argumentation frameworks
- Higher-order interactions (bipolar or not) in abstract argumentation: a state of the art
- New weak admissibility semantics for abstract argumentation
- On instantiating generalised properties of gradual argumentation frameworks
- On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
- On support relations in abstract argumentation as abstractions of inferential relations
- On supported inference and extension selection in abstract argumentation frameworks
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
- Persistence and monotony properties of argumentation semantics
- Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks
- SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
Cited in
(2)
This page was built for publication: A principle-based analysis of bipolar argumentation semantics
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6545533)
