How to manage supports in incomplete argumentation
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6630206
DOI10.1007/978-3-031-56940-1_18MaRDI QIDQ6630206FDOQ6630206
Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex, Antonio Yuste-Ginel, Jean-Guy Mailly
Publication date: 30 October 2024
Theory of languages and software systems (knowledge-based systems, expert systems, etc.) for artificial intelligence (68T35) Database theory (68P15) Computing methodologies for information systems (hypertext navigation, interfaces, decision support, etc.) (68U35)
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
- Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems
- Acceptance in incomplete argumentation frameworks
- A Generalization of Dung’s Abstract Framework for Argumentation: Arguing with Sets of Attacking Arguments
- Verification in incomplete argumentation frameworks
- Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding
- Extending abstract argumentation systems theory
- Dynamic Logic of Propositional Assignments: A Well-Behaved Variant of PDL
- Abstract Argumentation in Dynamic Logic: Representation, Reasoning and Change
- Capturing bipolar argumentation in non-flat assumption-based argumentation
- Constrained incomplete argumentation frameworks
- Abstract argumentation with qualitative uncertainty: an analysis in dynamic logic
- Extension-based semantics for incomplete argumentation frameworks
- A principle-based analysis of bipolar argumentation semantics
This page was built for publication: How to manage supports in incomplete argumentation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6630206)
