On support relations in abstract argumentation as abstractions of inferential relations

zbMATH Open1366.68294MaRDI QIDQ5283034FDOQ5283034

Authors: Henry Prakken 

Publication date: 18 July 2017

Full work available at URL: http://ebooks.iospress.nl/volumearticle/37029

Recommendations

• Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding
• Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation
• Logical limits of abstract argumentation frameworks
• An axiomatic approach to support in argumentation
• Modelling support relations between arguments in debates

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Cited In (13)

• Empirical evaluation of abstract argumentation: supporting the need for bipolar and probabilistic approaches
• A characterization of types of support between structured arguments and their relationship with support in abstract argumentation
• On supported inference and extension selection in abstract argumentation frameworks
• A labelling framework for probabilistic argumentation
• Logical foundations for bipolar and tripolar argumentation networks: preliminary results
• Instantiating metalevel argumentation frameworks
• On searching explanatory argumentation graphs
• A probabilistic deontic argumentation framework
• Modelling support relations between arguments in debates
• Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding
• Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations
• Epistemic graphs for representing and reasoning with positive and negative influences of arguments
• A principle-based analysis of bipolar argumentation semantics

This page was built for publication: On support relations in abstract argumentation as abstractions of inferential relations

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5283034)