A two-phase method for extracting explanatory arguments from Bayesian networks
DOI10.1016/J.IJAR.2016.09.002zbMATH Open1401.68331OpenAlexW2519350072WikidataQ102363040 ScholiaQ102363040MaRDI QIDQ2374549FDOQ2374549
Authors: Sjoerd T. Timmer, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij, Bart Verheij, John-Jules Meyer
Publication date: 15 December 2016
Published in: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2016.09.002
Recommendations
- Explaining Bayesian networks using argumentation
- Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
- Explaining the most probable explanation
- Bayesian Networks and Probabilistic Inference in Forensic Science
- Bayesian networks for probabilistic inference and decision analysis in forensic science. With a foreword by Ian Evett
Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)
Cites Work
- Abstract argumentation systems
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs
- A general account of argumentation with preferences
- A probabilistic approach to modelling uncertain logical arguments
- A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
- Bayesian Networks and Probabilistic Inference in Forensic Science
- Most relevant explanation in Bayesian networks
- Bayesian Networks
- DefLog: on the Logical Interpretation of Prima Facie Justified Assumptions
- Justification and defeat
- Explaining Bayesian networks using argumentation
- Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
Cited In (10)
- Computational complexity of flat and generic assumption-based argumentation, with and without probabilities
- Information graphs and their use for Bayesian network graph construction
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Combining argumentation and Bayesian nets for breast cancer prognosis
- Most Inforbable Explanations: Finding Explanations in Bayesian Networks That Are Both Probable and Informative
- Efficient search for relevance explanations using MAP-independence in Bayesian networks
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Explaining Bayesian networks using argumentation
- Probabilistic argumentation: an approach based on conditional probability. A preliminary report
- Epistemic graphs for representing and reasoning with positive and negative influences of arguments
This page was built for publication: A two-phase method for extracting explanatory arguments from Bayesian networks
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2374549)