A two-phase method for extracting explanatory arguments from Bayesian networks
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2374549
DOI10.1016/j.ijar.2016.09.002zbMath1401.68331OpenAlexW2519350072WikidataQ102363040 ScholiaQ102363040MaRDI QIDQ2374549
Bart Verheij, Henry Prakken, Sjoerd T. Timmer, Silja Renooij, John-Jules Ch. Meyer
Publication date: 15 December 2016
Published in: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2016.09.002
Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37)
Related Items (5)
Efficient search for relevance explanations using MAP-independence in Bayesian networks ⋮ Information graphs and their use for Bayesian network graph construction ⋮ Computational complexity of flat and generic assumption-based argumentation, with and without probabilities ⋮ Epistemic graphs for representing and reasoning with positive and negative influences of arguments ⋮ Probabilistic argumentation: an approach based on conditional probability. A preliminary report
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- A general account of argumentation with preferences
- A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
- Justification and defeat
- Abstract argumentation systems
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- A probabilistic approach to modelling uncertain logical arguments
- Bayesian Networks and Probabilistic Inference in Forensic Science
- Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs
- Explaining Bayesian Networks Using Argumentation
- DefLog: on the Logical Interpretation of Prima Facie Justified Assumptions
- Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
- Bayesian Networks
This page was built for publication: A two-phase method for extracting explanatory arguments from Bayesian networks
