Skepticism relations for comparing argumentation semantics

DOI10.1016/J.IJAR.2009.02.006MaRDI QIDQ962903zbMATH OpenOpenAlexDBLPWikidataFDO

Authors Pietro Baroni, Massimiliano Giacomin

Publication date 7 April 2010

Published in International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2009.02.006

zbMATH Keywords

argumentation semanticsargumentation theoryskepticism relations

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37)

Recommendations

• Comparing Argumentation Semantics with Respect to Skepticism
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
• Investigating the relationship between argumentation semantics via signatures
• Inductive defense for sceptical semantics of extended argumentation
• Parametric properties of ideal semantics

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1852916 (Why is no real title available?)
• A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
• A parameterised hierarchy of argumentation semantics for extended logic programming and its application to the well-founded semantics
• An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
• An argument-based approach to reasoning with specificity
• Comparing Argumentation Semantics with Respect to Skepticism
• Logic Programming
• On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
• On the Issue of Reinstatement in Argumentation
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
• SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
• Solving semantic problems with odd-length cycles in argumentation
• Strongly equivalent logic programs
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty

Cited in

(26)

• Conflict-tolerant semantics for argumentation frameworks
• A postulate-driven study of logical argumentation
• Initial sets in abstract argumentation frameworks
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
• Comparing Argumentation Semantics with Respect to Skepticism
• A generalized proof-theoretic approach to logical argumentation based on hypersequents
• Generating possible intentions with constrained argumentation systems
• Logics in Artificial Intelligence
• On the input/output behavior of argumentation frameworks
• Structural Analysis of Extension-Based Argumentation Semantics with Joint Acceptability
• Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method
• Stratified belief bases revision with argumentative inference
• A review of the relations between logical argumentation and reasoning with maximal consistency
• Arguing about informant credibility in open multi-agent systems
• Merging operators on stratified belief bases equipped with argumentative inference
• Belief revision and computational argumentation: a critical comparison
• Minimal hypotheses: extension-based semantics to argumentation
• On the complexity of probabilistic abstract argumentation frameworks
• On the resolution-based family of abstract argumentation semantics and its grounded instance
• AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks
• Abstract argument games via modal logic
• Investigating the relationship between argumentation semantics via signatures
• A formal framework for deliberated judgment
• Inductive defense for sceptical semantics of extended argumentation
• Argumentation for practical reasoning: an axiomatic approach
• An application of model checking games to abstract argumentation

This page was built for publication: Skepticism relations for comparing argumentation semantics

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q962903)