Skepticism relations for comparing argumentation semantics
From MaRDI portal
Publication:962903
DOI10.1016/J.IJAR.2009.02.006zbMATH Open1191.68671DBLPjournals/ijar/BaroniG09OpenAlexW2088885689WikidataQ57499577 ScholiaQ57499577MaRDI QIDQ962903FDOQ962903
Authors: Pietro Baroni, Massimiliano Giacomin 
Publication date: 7 April 2010
Published in: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2009.02.006
Recommendations
- Comparing Argumentation Semantics with Respect to Skepticism
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Investigating the relationship between argumentation semantics via signatures
- Inductive defense for sceptical semantics of extended argumentation
- Parametric properties of ideal semantics
Cites Work
- An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Strongly equivalent logic programs
- A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
- On the Issue of Reinstatement in Argumentation
- On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
- Comparing Argumentation Semantics with Respect to Skepticism
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
- Logic Programming
- Solving semantic problems with odd-length cycles in argumentation
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- An argument-based approach to reasoning with specificity
- A parameterised hierarchy of argumentation semantics for extended logic programming and its application to the well-founded semantics
Cited In (26)
- Conflict-tolerant semantics for argumentation frameworks
- A postulate-driven study of logical argumentation
- Initial sets in abstract argumentation frameworks
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Comparing Argumentation Semantics with Respect to Skepticism
- Logics in Artificial Intelligence
- A generalized proof-theoretic approach to logical argumentation based on hypersequents
- Generating possible intentions with constrained argumentation systems
- On the input/output behavior of argumentation frameworks
- Structural Analysis of Extension-Based Argumentation Semantics with Joint Acceptability
- Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method
- Stratified belief bases revision with argumentative inference
- A review of the relations between logical argumentation and reasoning with maximal consistency
- Arguing about informant credibility in open multi-agent systems
- Merging operators on stratified belief bases equipped with argumentative inference
- Belief revision and computational argumentation: a critical comparison
- Minimal hypotheses: extension-based semantics to argumentation
- On the complexity of probabilistic abstract argumentation frameworks
- On the resolution-based family of abstract argumentation semantics and its grounded instance
- AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks
- Abstract argument games via modal logic
- Investigating the relationship between argumentation semantics via signatures
- Inductive defense for sceptical semantics of extended argumentation
- A formal framework for deliberated judgment
- Argumentation for practical reasoning: an axiomatic approach
- An application of model checking games to abstract argumentation
This page was built for publication: Skepticism relations for comparing argumentation semantics
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q962903)
