An argumentative approach for handling inconsistency in prioritized Datalog ± ontologies
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5054970
DOI10.3233/AIC-220087zbMath1503.68257OpenAlexW4285801063MaRDI QIDQ5054970
Somjit Arch-Int, Loan Ho, Ngamnij Arch-Int, Stefan Schlobach, Erman Acar
Publication date: 12 December 2022
Published in: AI Communications (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.3233/aic-220087
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems
- On rules with existential variables: walking the decidability line
- Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
- Logic-based argumentation with existential rules
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- A review of the relations between logical argumentation and reasoning with maximal consistency
- Elect: an inconsistency handling approach for partially preordered lightweight ontologies
- Tractable reasoning and efficient query answering in description logics: The DL-Lite family
- Computing and Explaining Query Answers over Inconsistent DL-Lite Knowledge Bases
- The complexity of logic-based abduction
- On the Chase for All Provenance Paths with Existential Rules
- On the Semantics of Partially Ordered Bases
- Linking Data to Ontologies
- A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
This page was built for publication: An argumentative approach for handling inconsistency in prioritized Datalog ± ontologies
