Sets of attacking arguments for inconsistent Datalog knowledge bases

DOI10.3233/FAIA200526zbMATH Open1464.68381MaRDI QIDQ5145824FDOQ5145824

Authors: Bruno Yun, Srdjan Vesic, Madalina Croitoru 

Publication date: 21 January 2021

Recommendations

• Logic-based argumentation with existential rules
• Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
• Generalized Abstract Argumentation: Handling Arguments in FOL Fragments
• Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems
• Logical limits of abstract argumentation frameworks

zbMATH Keywords

argumentationDatalogSETAF

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Knowledge representation (68T30) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Cited In (10)

• An approach to generating arguments over DL-Lite ontologies
• On minimality and consistency tolerance in logical argumentation frameworks
• What can argumentation do for inconsistent ontology query answering?
• Sceptical and credulous approach to deductive argumentation
• Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems
• An argumentative approach for handling inconsistency in prioritized Datalog ± ontologies
• Computing repairs under functional and inclusion dependencies via argumentation
• Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
• Logic-based argumentation with existential rules
• Generalized Abstract Argumentation: Handling Arguments in FOL Fragments

This page was built for publication: Sets of attacking arguments for inconsistent Datalog knowledge bases

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5145824)