OSCAR

swMATH26328MaRDI QIDQ38059FDOQ38059

Author name not available (Why is that?)

Described by source

• How to reason defeasibly

Cited In (41)

• Augmenting tractable fragments of abstract argumentation
• Epistemic entrenchment and arithmetical hierarchy
• The logicist manifesto: At long last let logic-based artificial intelligence become a field unto itself
• Semi-stable semantics
• A QBF-based formalization of abstract argumentation semantics
• Cost-bounded argumentation
• Argumentation in artificial intelligence
• The Logical Handling of Threats, Rewards, Tips, and Warnings
• Inductive inference and argumentation methods in modern intelligent decision support systems
• SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
• A characterization of types of support between structured arguments and their relationship with support in abstract argumentation
• Abstract argumentation systems
• Self-stabilizing defeat status computation: dealing with conflict management in multi-agent systems
• A generalized proof-theoretic approach to logical argumentation based on hypersequents
• Generating possible intentions with constrained argumentation systems
• A formal account of Socratic-style argumentation
• A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
• Backdoors to satisfaction
• Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs
• Logical argumentation by dynamic proof systems
• A review of the relations between logical argumentation and reasoning with maximal consistency
• Justification and defeat
• Dynamic reasoning with qualified syllogisms
• A neural cognitive model of argumentation with application to legal inference and decision making
• A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
• Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems
• Valued preference-based instantiation of argumentation frameworks with varied strength defeats
• Minimal hypotheses: extension-based semantics to argumentation
• Extending abstract argumentation systems theory
• On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
• An argumentation system for defeasible reasoning
• Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation
• On three-valued acceptance conditions of abstract dialectical frameworks
• On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
• Uses and computation of imprecise probabilities from statistical data and expert arguments
• A relevance-theoretic framework for constructing and deconstructing enthymemes
• Algorithms and complexity results for persuasive argumentation
• Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties
• Deductive argumentation by enhanced sequent calculi and dynamic derivations
• I don't care, I don't know \(\dots \) I know too much! on incompleteness and undecidedness in abstract argumentation
• Building an epistemic logic for argumentation

This page was built for software: OSCAR