Probabilistic qualification of attack in abstract argumentation
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2353976
DOI10.1016/J.IJAR.2013.09.002zbMATH Open1316.68153OpenAlexW1980124003MaRDI QIDQ2353976
Publication date: 10 July 2015
Published in: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2013.09.002
abstract argumentationprobabilistic argumentationcomputational models of argumentargument systemsenthymemesuncertain argumentation
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Argumentation in artificial intelligence
- Computing ideal sceptical argumentation
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Dialectic proof procedures for assumption-based, admissible argumentation
- A probabilistic approach to modelling uncertain logical arguments
- Probabilistic argumentation systems
- A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
- A logic programming framework for possibilistic argumentation: Formalization and logical properties
- A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
- Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
- Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
- A Relevance-theoretic Framework for Constructing and Deconstructing Enthymemes
- On Decision Problems Related to the Preferred Semantics for Argumentation Frameworks
- Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning
- Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results
- Semantics and complexity of abduction from default theories
- Qualitative methods for reasoning under uncertainty
- Jumping to Conclusions
- Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
- Argumentation through a distributed self-stabilizing approach
- Using probabilistic argumentation for key validation in public-key cryptography
- Cost-bounded argumentation
- A proof theoretic approach to qualitative probabilistic reasoning
- Defining normative systems for qualitative argumentation
Cited In (28)
- Computational complexity of flat and generic assumption-based argumentation, with and without probabilities
- Proximity semantics for topic-based abstract argumentation
- Neighborhood-based argumental community support in the context of multi-topic debates
- Complexity of fundamental problems in probabilistic abstract argumentation: beyond independence
- Encompassing Attacks to Attacks in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
- Dialectical Proof Procedures for Probabilistic Abstract Argumentation
- On efficiently estimating the probability of extensions in abstract argumentation frameworks
- Argumentation for Practical Reasoning: An Axiomatic Approach
- Forecasting with jury-based probabilistic argumentation
- Probabilistic Three-Valued Argumentation Frameworks
- Explainable acceptance in probabilistic and incomplete abstract argumentation frameworks
- Theory of disjunctive attacks, Part I
- Optimization of dialectical outcomes in dialogical argumentation
- Tabulation proof procedures for fuzzy linguistic logic programming
- Probabilistic argumentation: an approach based on conditional probability. A preliminary report
- A graded approach to database repair by context-aware distance semantics
- Inference procedures and engine for probabilistic argumentation
- Correct Grounded Reasoning with Presumptive Arguments
- A general approach to reasoning with probabilities
- A formal framework for deliberated judgment
- Focusing the argumentative process: neighborhood-based semantics in abstract argumentation
- A polynomial-time fragment of epistemic probabilistic argumentation
- Argumentation Framework Based on Evidence Theory
- On the Complexity of Probabilistic Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
- Formulating Semantics of Probabilistic Argumentation by Characterizing Subgraphs
- Verification in incomplete argumentation frameworks
- A distributed argumentation algorithm for mining consistent opinions in weighted Twitter discussions
- Probabilistic causal bipolar abstract argumentation: an approach based on credal networks
Uses Software
This page was built for publication: Probabilistic qualification of attack in abstract argumentation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2353976)
