A distributed argumentation algorithm for mining consistent opinions in weighted Twitter discussions

DOI10.1007/s00500-018-3380-xzbMath1418.91423OpenAlexW2875864444WikidataQ61918754 ScholiaQ61918754MaRDI QIDQ2317506

Ramón Béjar, Teresa Alsinet, Josep Argelich, Joel Cemeli

Publication date: 12 August 2019

Published in: Soft Computing (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/67673

zbMATH Keywords

distributed algorithmtractable casesprobability valuesTwitter discussionsvalued argumentation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Social networks; opinion dynamics (91D30) Distributed algorithms (68W15)

Uses Software

• ASPARTIX
• Pregel

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• A bridging model for multi-core computing
• Argumentation in artificial intelligence
• Computing ideal sceptical argumentation
• Computational properties of argument systems satisfying graph-theoretic constraints
• The computational complexity of ideal semantics
• Augmenting tractable fragments of abstract argumentation
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Probabilistic qualification of attack in abstract argumentation
• Weighted argumentation for analysis of discussions in Twitter
• On the Complexity of Probabilistic Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
• Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
• Integrating argumentation and sentiment analysis for mining opinions from Twitter
• Argumentation through a distributed self-stabilizing approach
• Logics in Artificial Intelligence
• A logic-based theory of deductive arguments

This page was built for publication: A distributed argumentation algorithm for mining consistent opinions in weighted Twitter discussions