Forecasting with jury-based probabilistic argumentation

DOI10.1080/11663081.2023.2244716MaRDI QIDQ6056710zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Francesca Toni, Antonio Rago, Kristijonas Čyras

Publication date 30 October 2023

Published in Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Copyright license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1080/11663081.2023.2244716

zbMATH Keywords

Bayesian networkscomputational argumentationforecasting

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Mathematical logic and foundations (03-XX)

Cites work

• A general framework for sound assumption-based argumentation dialogues
• A generalised framework for dispute derivations in assumption-based argumentation
• Abducing through negation as failure: stable models within the independent choice logic
• An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
• Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
• Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
• Causality. Models, reasoning, and inference
• Combining argumentation and Bayesian nets for breast cancer prognosis
• Computational complexity of flat and generic assumption-based argumentation, with and without probabilities
• Computing ideal sceptical argumentation
• Dialectic proof procedures for assumption-based, admissible argumentation
• Do `big losses' in judgmental adjustments to statistical forecasts affect experts' behaviour?
• Empirical evaluation of abstract argumentation: supporting the need for bipolar and probabilistic approaches
• Explaining Bayesian networks using argumentation
• Logic, Probability and Computation: Foundations and Issues of Statistical Relational AI
• On efficiently estimating the probability of extensions in abstract argumentation frameworks
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
• Probabilistic (logic) programming concepts
• Probabilistic argumentation
• Probabilistic Horn abduction and Bayesian networks
• Probabilistic logic programming
• Probabilistic qualification of attack in abstract argumentation
• Probabilistic reasoning with answer sets
• Towards a common framework for dialectical proof procedures in abstract argumentation
• Unifying logical and statistical AI
• Using judgment to select and adjust forecasts from statistical models

Cited in

(1)

• Investigation of semantic behavior in probabilistic argumentation

This page was built for publication: Forecasting with jury-based probabilistic argumentation

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6056710)