Explaining Bayesian networks using argumentation

DOI10.1007/978-3-319-20807-7_8MaRDI QIDQ3451167zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Sjoerd T. Timmer, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij, Bart Verheij, John-Jules Meyer

Publication date 10 November 2015

Published in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20807-7_8

zbMATH Keywords

argumentationBayesian networksexplanationinferencereasoninguncertainty

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Probabilistic graphical models (62H22) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37)

Recommendations

• A two-phase method for extracting explanatory arguments from Bayesian networks
• Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
• Explaining the most probable explanation
• Most relevant explanation in Bayesian networks
• Probabilistic argumentation systems

Cites work

• A general account of argumentation with preferences
• A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
• Abstract argumentation systems
• Bayesian Networks and Probabilistic Inference in Forensic Science
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 48812 (Why is no real title available?)
• Justification and defeat
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games

Cited in

(15)

• Persuasive contrastive explanations for Bayesian networks
• Constructing Bayesian network graphs from labeled arguments
• A two-phase method for extracting explanatory arguments from Bayesian networks
• Most relevant explanation in Bayesian networks
• Why making Bayesian networks objectively Bayesian makes sense
• On searching explanatory argumentation graphs
• Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
• A Bayesian approach to forward and inverse abstract argumentation problems
• Forecasting with jury-based probabilistic argumentation
• Explaining the most probable explanation
• Descriptive accuracy in explanations: the case of probabilistic classifiers
• Efficient search for relevance explanations using MAP-independence in Bayesian networks
• A labelling framework for probabilistic argumentation
• Extension-ranking semantics for abstract argumentation
• Combining argumentation and Bayesian nets for breast cancer prognosis

This page was built for publication: Explaining Bayesian networks using argumentation

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3451167)