Explaining Bayesian networks using argumentation
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 48812 (Why is no real title available?)
- A general account of argumentation with preferences
- A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
- Abstract argumentation systems
- Bayesian Networks and Probabilistic Inference in Forensic Science
- Justification and defeat
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
Cited in
(13)- Combining argumentation and Bayesian nets for breast cancer prognosis
- Explaining the most probable explanation
- A labelling framework for probabilistic argumentation
- Descriptive accuracy in explanations: the case of probabilistic classifiers
- Efficient search for relevance explanations using MAP-independence in Bayesian networks
- Forecasting with jury-based probabilistic argumentation
- Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
- Persuasive contrastive explanations for Bayesian networks
- On searching explanatory argumentation graphs
- Why making Bayesian networks objectively Bayesian makes sense
- Most relevant explanation in Bayesian networks
- A two-phase method for extracting explanatory arguments from Bayesian networks
- A Bayesian approach to forward and inverse abstract argumentation problems
This page was built for publication: Explaining Bayesian networks using argumentation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3451167)