An approach to decision making based on dynamic argumentation systems
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: In this paper, we introduce a formalism for single-agent decision making that is based on Dynamic Argumentation Frameworks. The formalism can be used to justify a choice, which is based on the current situation the agent is involved. Taking advantage of the inference mechanism of the argumentation formalism, it is possible to consider preference relations and conflicts among the available alternatives for that reasoning. With this formalization, given a particular set of evidence, the justified conclusions supported by warranted arguments will be used by the agent's decision rules to determine which alternatives will be selected. We also present an algorithm that implements a choice function based on our formalization. Finally, we complete our presentation by introducing formal results that relate the proposed framework with approaches of classical decision theory.
Recommendations
- Argumentation based dynamic multiple criteria decision making
- Dynamic argument systems: A formal model of argumentation processes based on situation calculus
- A P-DeLP instantiation of a dynamic argumentation framework for decision making
- On Revising Argumentation-Based Decision Systems
- Decision making with assumption-based argumentation
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3436873 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1852917 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3084669 (Why is no real title available?)
- A logic programming framework for possibilistic argumentation: Formalization and logical properties
- Arguing over Actions That Involve Multiple Criteria: A Critical Review
- Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
- Assumption-based argumentation for decision-making with preferences: a medical case study
- Computational representation of practical argument
- Decision making with assumption-based argumentation
- Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
- Microeconomic theory
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
- Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- The local geometry of multiattribute tradeoff preferences
- The logic of preference reconsidered
- The transferable belief model
- Using arguments for making and explaining decisions
Cited in
(16)- Decision making with assumption-based argumentation
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5877359 (Why is no real title available?)
- A P-DeLP instantiation of a dynamic argumentation framework for decision making
- Automated Reasoning
- Nested Argumentation and Its Application to Decision Making over Actions
- Dynamic argument systems: A formal model of argumentation processes based on situation calculus
- Modelling the ``Laboratory of dilemmas: challenges and suggestions for argument-based decision making
- Towards Evidence Retrieval Cost Reduction in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks with Fallible Evidence
- Using arguments for making and explaining decisions
- Reasoning in BDI agents using Toulmin's argumentation model
- Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations
- A formal framework for deliberated judgment
- Design of a participatory decision making agent architecture based on argumentation and influence function -- application to a serious game about biodiversity conservation
- On the responsibility for undecisiveness in preferred and stable labellings in abstract argumentation
- Assumption-Based Argumentation for Selection and Composition of Services
- Argumentation based dynamic multiple criteria decision making
This page was built for publication: An approach to decision making based on dynamic argumentation systems
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q343918)
