Social Argument Justification: Some Mechanisms and Conditions for Their Coincidence

DOI10.1007/978-3-642-02906-6_10zbMath1245.91014MaRDI QIDQ3638141

Marcelo Auday, Gustavo Adrián Bodanza

Publication date: 2 July 2009

Published in: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02906-6_10

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

91A44: Games involving topology, set theory, or logic

68T27: Logic in artificial intelligence

91B26: Auctions, bargaining, bidding and selling, and other market models

91B14: Social choice

Related Items

Graph aggregation, Preservation of semantic properties in collective argumentation: the case of aggregating abstract argumentation frameworks, A paradox of expert rights in abstract argumentation

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Aggregating sets of judgments: two impossibility results compared. With a comment by Isaac Levi
• Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation
• On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Propositional belief base merging or how to merge beliefs/goals coming from several sources and some links with social choice theory
• Handbook of social choice and welfare. Vol. 1.
• Hierarchical Argumentation
• Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
• Aggregation of Attack Relations: A Social-Choice Theoretical Analysis of Defeasibility Criteria