Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation
From MaRDI portal
Publication:857691
DOI10.1007/s11229-006-9063-7zbMath1112.03305MaRDI QIDQ857691
Publication date: 20 December 2006
Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9063-7
03A05: Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations
03B42: Logics of knowledge and belief (including belief change)
Related Items
Judgement aggregation in non-classical logics, A Geometric Approach to Paradoxes of Majority Voting: From Anscombe’s Paradox to the Discursive Dilemma with Saari and Nurmi, Logical Opposition and Collective Decisions, Unnamed Item, Unnamed Item, The Complexity Landscape of Outcome Determination in Judgment Aggregation, Mind the Divide Surrounding Knowledge Representation, Copula-opinion pooling with complex opinions, Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation, Merging operators on stratified belief bases equipped with argumentative inference, On manipulation in merging epistemic states, The logic of group decisions: judgment aggregation, Local supermajorities, The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review, Judgment aggregation and the problem of tracking the truth, Scoring rules for judgment aggregation, Belief merging and judgment aggregation in fuzzy setting, Acceptance, aggregation and scoring rules, Logic based merging, Equilibria in social belief removal, Judgment aggregation and minimal change: a model of consensus formation by belief revision, Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation, Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others, A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation, Decision framing in judgment aggregation, Introduction to judgment aggregation, The possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implications, On the dynamics of institutional agreements, Ranking judgments in Arrow's setting, Majority merging by adaptive counting, Geometric models of consistent judgement aggregation, The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory, Judgment aggregation in nonmonotonic logic, Aggregating incoherent agents who disagree, Complexity of control in judgment aggregation for uniform premise-based quota rules, Geodesic merging, Social pressure in opinion dynamics, A partial taxonomy of judgment aggregation rules and their properties, Approximately classic judgement aggregation, Aggregating with reason(s), A measure of distance between judgment sets, Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case, Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation, Which worlds are possible? A judgment aggregation problem, Truth approximation, belief merging, and peer disagreement, Introduction to Judgment Aggregation, Social Argument Justification: Some Mechanisms and Conditions for Their Coincidence
Cites Work
- Aggregating sets of judgments: two impossibility results compared. With a comment by Isaac Levi
- The probability of inconsistencies in complex collective decisions
- \(\text{DA}^2\) merging operators
- Logical constraints on judgement aggregation
- A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation
- Aggregation of binary evaluations
- Propositional belief base merging or how to merge beliefs/goals coming from several sources and some links with social choice theory
- Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation
- Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
- Democratic answers to complex questions -- an epistemic perspective
- On the Semantics of Arbitration
- Merging Information Under Constraints: A Logical Framework
- Belief fusion: Aggregating pedigreed belief states
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
