Scoring rules for judgment aggregation
From MaRDI portal
Publication:404749
DOI10.1007/s00355-013-0757-8zbMath1302.91080OpenAlexW2075495223WikidataQ59324925 ScholiaQ59324925MaRDI QIDQ404749
Publication date: 4 September 2014
Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-013-0757-8
Related Items (16)
The logic of group decisions: judgment aggregation ⋮ Logic and majority voting ⋮ Merging existential rules programs in multi-agent contexts through credibility accrual ⋮ The median rule in judgement aggregation ⋮ A partial taxonomy of judgment aggregation rules and their properties ⋮ Characterising scoring rules by their solution in iteratively undominated strategies ⋮ The doctrinal paradox: comparison of decision rules in a probabilistic framework ⋮ An axiomatic characterization of the Borda mean rule ⋮ Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others ⋮ Unnamed Item ⋮ The Complexity Landscape of Outcome Determination in Judgment Aggregation ⋮ Judgments aggregation by a sequential majority procedure ⋮ Social choice rules driven by propositional logic ⋮ The Borda class. An axiomatic study of the Borda rule on top-truncated preferences ⋮ Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation ⋮ Aggregation of binary evaluations: a Borda-like approach
Cites Work
- Variable-population voting rules
- Judgment aggregation in search for the truth
- Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation
- The probability of inconsistencies in complex collective decisions
- Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation
- Abstract Arrowian aggregation
- Aggregation of binary evaluations
- Majority voting on restricted domains
- The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation
- Justifiable group choice
- The possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implications
- The voters' paradox, spin, and the Borda count
- On the theory of aggregation
- Axiomatic derivation of scoring rules without the ordering assumption
- Thirteen theorems in search of the truth
- Consistency without neutrality in voting rules: When is a vote an average?
- General representation of epistemically optimal procedures
- A measure of distance between judgment sets
- Voting rules as statistical estimators
- Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation
- Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
- Democratic answers to complex questions -- an epistemic perspective
- A generalised model of judgment aggregation
- Reliable Methods of Judgement Aggregation
- Social Choice Scoring Functions
- Aggregation of Preferences with Variable Electorate
- Merging Information Under Constraints: A Logical Framework
This page was built for publication: Scoring rules for judgment aggregation