Scoring rules for judgment aggregation

DOI10.1007/S00355-013-0757-8zbMATH Open1302.91080DBLPjournals/scw/Dietrich14OpenAlexW2075495223WikidataQ59324925 ScholiaQ59324925MaRDI QIDQ404749FDOQ404749

Authors: Franz Dietrich 

Publication date: 4 September 2014

Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-013-0757-8

Recommendations

• Judgment aggregation rules and voting rules
• A partial taxonomy of judgment aggregation rules and their properties
• The median rule in judgement aggregation
• Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
• The informational basis of scoring rules

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Social choice (91B14)

Cites Work

• The voters' paradox, spin, and the Borda count
• On the theory of aggregation
• A measure of distance between judgment sets
• Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation
• Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
• Democratic answers to complex questions -- an epistemic perspective
• A generalised model of judgment aggregation
• Reliable methods of judgement aggregation
• Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation
• The probability of inconsistencies in complex collective decisions
• Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation
• Abstract Arrowian aggregation
• Aggregation of binary evaluations
• The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation
• Justifiable group choice
• Aggregation of Preferences with Variable Electorate
• Judgment aggregation in search for the truth
• Social Choice Scoring Functions
• Voting rules as statistical estimators
• Merging Information Under Constraints: A Logical Framework
• Majority voting on restricted domains
• Axiomatic derivation of scoring rules without the ordering assumption
• Consistency without neutrality in voting rules: When is a vote an average?
• Variable-population voting rules
• Thirteen theorems in search of the truth
• General representation of epistemically optimal procedures
• The possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implications

Cited In (20)

• Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others
• Aggregation of binary evaluations: a Borda-like approach
• The logic of group decisions: judgment aggregation
• The Borda class. An axiomatic study of the Borda rule on top-truncated preferences
• Judgments aggregation by a sequential majority procedure
• Social choice rules driven by propositional logic
• Merging existential rules programs in multi-agent contexts through credibility accrual
• An axiomatic characterization of the Borda mean rule
• Scoring rules and consensus
• The median rule in judgement aggregation
• A partial taxonomy of judgment aggregation rules and their properties
• Logic and majority voting
• Scoring rules: a cooperative game-theoretic approach
• Characterising scoring rules by their solution in iteratively undominated strategies
• Judgment aggregation rules and voting rules
• The doctrinal paradox: comparison of decision rules in a probabilistic framework
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• The Complexity Landscape of Outcome Determination in Judgment Aggregation
• Consistency of scoring rules: a reinvestigation of composition-consistency
• Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation

This page was built for publication: Scoring rules for judgment aggregation

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q404749)