Scoring rules for judgment aggregation
From MaRDI portal
Publication:404749
DOI10.1007/S00355-013-0757-8zbMATH Open1302.91080DBLPjournals/scw/Dietrich14OpenAlexW2075495223WikidataQ59324925 ScholiaQ59324925MaRDI QIDQ404749FDOQ404749
Publication date: 4 September 2014
Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-013-0757-8
Cites Work
- The voters' paradox, spin, and the Borda count
- On the theory of aggregation
- A measure of distance between judgment sets
- Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation
- Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
- Democratic answers to complex questions -- an epistemic perspective
- A generalised model of judgment aggregation
- Reliable Methods of Judgement Aggregation
- Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation
- The probability of inconsistencies in complex collective decisions
- Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation
- Abstract Arrowian aggregation
- Aggregation of binary evaluations
- The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation
- Justifiable group choice
- Aggregation of Preferences with Variable Electorate
- Judgment aggregation in search for the truth
- Social Choice Scoring Functions
- Voting rules as statistical estimators
- Merging Information Under Constraints: A Logical Framework
- Majority voting on restricted domains
- Axiomatic derivation of scoring rules without the ordering assumption
- Consistency without neutrality in voting rules: When is a vote an average?
- Variable-population voting rules
- Thirteen theorems in search of the truth
- General representation of epistemically optimal procedures
- The possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implications
Cited In (17)
- Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others
- Aggregation of binary evaluations: a Borda-like approach
- The logic of group decisions: judgment aggregation
- The Borda class. An axiomatic study of the Borda rule on top-truncated preferences
- Judgments aggregation by a sequential majority procedure
- Social choice rules driven by propositional logic
- Merging existential rules programs in multi-agent contexts through credibility accrual
- An axiomatic characterization of the Borda mean rule
- The median rule in judgement aggregation
- A partial taxonomy of judgment aggregation rules and their properties
- Logic and majority voting
- Characterising scoring rules by their solution in iteratively undominated strategies
- The doctrinal paradox: comparison of decision rules in a probabilistic framework
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- The Complexity Landscape of Outcome Determination in Judgment Aggregation
- Consistency of scoring rules: a reinvestigation of composition-consistency
- Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation
This page was built for publication: Scoring rules for judgment aggregation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q404749)