The possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implications
From MaRDI portal
Publication:969121
DOI10.1016/J.JET.2007.11.003zbMATH Open1238.91057OpenAlexW1996971007MaRDI QIDQ969121FDOQ969121
Authors: Franz Dietrich
Publication date: 11 May 2010
Published in: Journal of Economic Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/27899/1/The_possibility_of_judgement_aggregation_%28LSERO_version%29.pdf
Recommendations
judgment aggregationmaterial implicationcharacterisation of possibility agendassubjunctive implication
Cites Work
- Counterfactuals.
- Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation
- Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
- A generalised model of judgment aggregation
- Aggregating sets of judgments: two impossibility results compared. With a comment by Isaac Levi
- Logical constraints on judgement aggregation
- Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation
- Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation
- An introduction to non-classical logic
- Merging Information Under Constraints: A Logical Framework
- The limits of epistemic democracy
- Consistent judgement aggregation: the truth-functional case
- Title not available (Why is that?)
Cited In (19)
- A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation
- Majority voting on restricted domains
- Aggregating with reason(s)
- Scoring rules for judgment aggregation
- The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation
- Introduction to judgment aggregation
- Justifiable group choice
- The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation
- Judgment aggregation in search for the truth
- Judgement aggregation in non-classical logics
- The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory
- Bureaucracy in quest of feasibility
- An Abstract Algebraic Logic View on Judgment Aggregation
- Which worlds are possible? A judgment aggregation problem
- A generalised model of judgment aggregation
- Judgment aggregation in nonmonotonic logic
- A hierarchical approach to judgment aggregation with abstentions
- Aggregating Credences into Beliefs: Agenda Conditions for Impossibility Results
- Quota rules for incomplete judgments
This page was built for publication: The possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implications
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q969121)