Consistent judgement aggregation: the truth-functional case

DOI10.1007/S00355-007-0261-0zbMATH Open1142.91439OpenAlexW2080626924MaRDI QIDQ930478FDOQ930478

Clemens Puppe, Klaus Nehring

Publication date: 30 June 2008

Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-007-0261-0

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Social choice (91B14)

Cites Work

• Algebraic aggregation theory
• A possibility theorem on aggregation over multiple interconnected propositions
• Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
• A generalised model of judgment aggregation
• Aggregating sets of judgments: two impossibility results compared. With a comment by Isaac Levi
• Logical constraints on judgement aggregation
• Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation
• Aggregation of binary evaluations
• Judgment aggregation without full rationality
• The structure of strategy-proof social choice. I: General characterization and possibility results on median spaces
• Arrow's theorem as a corollary
• Aggregation of binary evaluations with abstentions
• The limits of epistemic democracy
• The impossibility of a paretian rational: a Bayesian perspective

Cited In (32)

• Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others
• A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation
• Aggregation of binary evaluations with abstentions
• Majority voting on restricted domains
• Neutrality and relative acceptability in judgment aggregation
• Incoherent majorities: the McGarvey problem in judgement aggregation
• The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation
• Aggregation of binary evaluations for truth-functional agendas
• Approximately classic judgement aggregation
• Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation
• Geometric models of consistent judgement aggregation
• Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation
• Abstract Arrowian aggregation
• Aggregation of binary evaluations
• Introduction to judgment aggregation
• Justifiable group choice
• The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation
• The possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implications
• Judgment aggregation in search for the truth
• The rarity of consistent aggregators
• Neutral freedom and freedom as control
• Judgement aggregation in non-classical logics
• Efficient and strategy-proof voting rules: A characterization
• The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory
• On manipulation in merging epistemic states
• A general method for deciding about logically constrained issues
• The problem of no hands: responsibility voids in collective decisions
• Premise-based vs conclusion-based collective choice
• Synthesizing judgements: a functional equations approach
• Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case
• The limits of epistemic democracy
• Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation

   Recommendations

• Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems 👍 👎
• Judgment aggregation without full rationality 👍 👎
• Geometric models of consistent judgement aggregation 👍 👎
• Complexity of Judgment Aggregation 👍 👎
• Aggregating sets of judgments: two impossibility results compared. With a comment by Isaac Levi 👍 👎

This page was built for publication: Consistent judgement aggregation: the truth-functional case

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q930478)