Consistent judgement aggregation: the truth-functional case

DOI10.1007/s00355-007-0261-0zbMath1142.91439MaRDI QIDQ930478

Klaus Nehring, Clemens D. Puppe

Publication date: 30 June 2008

Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-007-0261-0

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

91B14: Social choice

Related Items

Incoherent majorities: the McGarvey problem in judgement aggregation, Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation, A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation, Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation, Introduction to judgment aggregation, Abstract Arrowian aggregation, Aggregation of binary evaluations, Majority voting on restricted domains, Aggregation of binary evaluations with abstentions, The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation, Justifiable group choice, The possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implications, A general method for deciding about logically constrained issues, The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory, The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation, Aggregation of binary evaluations for truth-functional agendas, Efficient and strategy-proof voting rules: A characterization, Approximately classic judgement aggregation, The limits of epistemic democracy

Cites Work

• Aggregating sets of judgments: two impossibility results compared. With a comment by Isaac Levi
• Logical constraints on judgement aggregation
• Judgment aggregation without full rationality
• Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation
• Aggregation of binary evaluations
• Aggregation of binary evaluations with abstentions
• The structure of strategy-proof social choice. I: General characterization and possibility results on median spaces
• Algebraic aggregation theory
• A possibility theorem on aggregation over multiple interconnected propositions
• Arrow's theorem as a corollary
• The impossibility of a paretian rational: a Bayesian perspective
• Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
• The limits of epistemic democracy
• A generalised model of judgment aggregation