The probability of inconsistencies in complex collective decisions
From MaRDI portal
Publication:812352
DOI10.1007/S00355-003-0253-7zbMATH Open1100.91020OpenAlexW2102741893MaRDI QIDQ812352FDOQ812352
Authors: Christian List
Publication date: 23 January 2006
Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/664/1/inconsistencies.pdf
Recommendations
- Aggregating sets of judgments: two impossibility results compared. With a comment by Isaac Levi
- The doctrinal paradox: comparison of decision rules in a probabilistic framework
- Consistent judgement aggregation: the truth-functional case
- The Condorcet set: majority voting over interconnected propositions
- A possibility theorem on aggregation over multiple interconnected propositions
Cited In (44)
- Preferences over procedures and outcomes in judgment aggregation: an experimental study
- A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation
- The impossibility of a paretian rational: a Bayesian perspective
- Consistency of decision processes
- Avoiding Anscombe's paradox
- Single-switch preferences and the Ostrogorski paradox
- The logic of group decisions: judgment aggregation
- Truth-tracking judgment aggregation over interconnected issues
- Judgment aggregation and the problem of tracking the truth
- Premise-based versus outcome-based information aggregation
- Scoring rules for judgment aggregation
- Approximately classic judgement aggregation
- Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation
- Decision-making by hierarchies of discordant agents
- Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation
- Group decision-making in the shadow of disagreement
- Instability and convergence under simple-majority rule: results from simulation of committee choice in two-dimensional space.
- Introduction to judgment aggregation
- Introduction to judgment aggregation
- Judgment aggregation in search for the truth
- The rarity of consistent aggregators
- A Geometric Approach to Paradoxes of Majority Voting: From Anscombe’s Paradox to the Discursive Dilemma with Saari and Nurmi
- Boundary properties of the inconsistency of pairwise comparisons in group decisions
- Instability of \textit{ex post} aggregation in the Bolker-Jeffrey framework and related instability phenomena
- The consensus problem in the behavioral approach
- A possibility theorem on aggregation over multiple interconnected propositions
- The probability of collective choice with shared knowledge structures
- On the Probability of the Ostrogorski Paradox
- Jury theorems with multiple alternatives
- Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation
- Meetings in deadlock and decision makers with interperception.
- Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
- A generalised model of judgment aggregation
- Effective group size of majority vote accuracy in sequential decision-making
- Interval generalization of the Bayesian model of collective decision-making in conflict situations
- Optimal group composition for efficient division of labor
- Paradox of voting and the trivial preference set of group decision making
- Costly verification in collective decisions
- The doctrinal paradox: comparison of decision rules in a probabilistic framework
- Premise-based vs conclusion-based collective choice
- The effect of social homogeneity on coincidence probabilities for pairwise proportional lottery and simple majority rules
- Aggregating disparate estimates of chance
- The limits of epistemic democracy
- The source of some paradoxes from social choice and probability
This page was built for publication: The probability of inconsistencies in complex collective decisions
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q812352)