The probability of inconsistencies in complex collective decisions
From MaRDI portal
Publication:812352
Recommendations
- Aggregating sets of judgments: two impossibility results compared. With a comment by Isaac Levi
- The doctrinal paradox: comparison of decision rules in a probabilistic framework
- Consistent judgement aggregation: the truth-functional case
- The Condorcet set: majority voting over interconnected propositions
- A possibility theorem on aggregation over multiple interconnected propositions
Cited in
(51)- Decision-making by hierarchies of discordant agents
- Introduction to judgment aggregation
- Premise-based vs conclusion-based collective choice
- The probability of collective choice with shared knowledge structures
- A possibility theorem on aggregation over multiple interconnected propositions
- Preferences over procedures and outcomes in judgment aggregation: an experimental study
- Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation
- Consistency of decision processes
- Open and closed questions in decision-making
- The probability of pluralistic ignorance
- Optimal group composition for efficient division of labor
- Jury theorems with multiple alternatives
- Group decision-making in the shadow of disagreement
- Paradox of voting and the trivial preference set of group decision making
- The effect of social homogeneity on coincidence probabilities for pairwise proportional lottery and simple majority rules
- Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation
- Effective group size of majority vote accuracy in sequential decision-making
- Costly verification in collective decisions
- A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation
- Aggregating disparate estimates of chance
- The Condorcet set: majority voting over interconnected propositions
- Instability and convergence under simple-majority rule: results from simulation of committee choice in two-dimensional space.
- Avoiding Anscombe's paradox
- On the Probability of the Ostrogorski Paradox
- Instability of \textit{ex post} aggregation in the Bolker-Jeffrey framework and related instability phenomena
- Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation
- The impossibility of a paretian rational: a Bayesian perspective
- Meetings in deadlock and decision makers with interperception.
- Unanimity and the Anscombe's paradox
- The consensus problem in the behavioral approach
- A generalised model of judgment aggregation
- A geometric approach to paradoxes of majority voting: from Anscombe's paradox to the discursive dilemma with Saari and Nurmi
- Truth-tracking judgment aggregation over interconnected issues
- Interval generalization of the Bayesian model of collective decision-making in conflict situations
- Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
- Judgment aggregation and the problem of tracking the truth
- The rarity of consistent aggregators
- The discursive dilemma in monetary policy
- Judgment aggregation in search for the truth
- Approximately classic judgement aggregation
- Introduction to judgment aggregation
- The doctrinal paradox: comparison of decision rules in a probabilistic framework
- How indeterminate is sequential majority voting? A judgement aggregation perspective
- Single-switch preferences and the Ostrogorski paradox
- Community standards
- The logic of group decisions: judgment aggregation
- Premise-based versus outcome-based information aggregation
- Boundary properties of the inconsistency of pairwise comparisons in group decisions
- The source of some paradoxes from social choice and probability
- The limits of epistemic democracy
- Scoring rules for judgment aggregation
This page was built for publication: The probability of inconsistencies in complex collective decisions
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q812352)
