Judgment aggregation and the problem of tracking the truth
From MaRDI portal
Publication:383025
DOI10.1007/s11229-011-0031-5zbMath1275.91048OpenAlexW2171809879MaRDI QIDQ383025
Jan Sprenger, Stephan Hartmann
Publication date: 25 November 2013
Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-0031-5
Related Items (9)
The logic of group decisions: judgment aggregation ⋮ The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory ⋮ A game-theoretic approach to peer disagreement ⋮ Neutrality and relative acceptability in judgment aggregation ⋮ The Complexity Landscape of Outcome Determination in Judgment Aggregation ⋮ Truth approximation, belief merging, and peer disagreement ⋮ Group disagreement: a belief aggregation perspective ⋮ A probabilistic evaluation framework for preference aggregation reflecting group homogeneity ⋮ Strategyproof judgment aggregation under partial information
Cites Work
- Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation
- The probability of inconsistencies in complex collective decisions
- Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation
- Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation
- The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation
- The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory
- Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation
- Democratic answers to complex questions -- an epistemic perspective
- Reliable Methods of Judgement Aggregation
This page was built for publication: Judgment aggregation and the problem of tracking the truth
