Democratic answers to complex questions -- an epistemic perspective
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2502379
DOI10.1007/s11229-006-0005-1zbMath1175.91060OpenAlexW2128217551MaRDI QIDQ2502379
Publication date: 12 September 2006
Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-0005-1
judgment aggregationvoting proceduresdiscursive dilemmaCondorcet jury theoremepistemic democracydeliberative democracyPettit
Related Items
The logic of group decisions: judgment aggregation, Introduction to Judgment Aggregation, A generalised model of judgment aggregation, Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation, The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review, Judgment aggregation and the problem of tracking the truth, The doctrinal paradox: comparison of decision rules in a probabilistic framework, The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory, Scoring rules for judgment aggregation, Preferences over procedures and outcomes in judgment aggregation: an experimental study, Approximately classic judgement aggregation, Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case, Voting rules as statistical estimators, A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation, Judgment aggregation in search for the truth, Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation, Which worlds are possible? A judgment aggregation problem, Logic based merging, Introduction to judgment aggregation, Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems, The rarity of consistent aggregators, Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation, A possibility theorem on aggregation over multiple interconnected propositions, Premise-based vs conclusion-based collective choice, Truth-tracking judgment aggregation over interconnected issues, Strategyproof judgment aggregation under partial information, Premise-based versus outcome-based information aggregation
Cites Work
