Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case

DOI10.1007/S00355-012-0661-7MaRDI QIDQ2452241zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Franz Dietrich, Christian List

Publication date 2 June 2014

Published in Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)

Copyright license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-012-0661-7

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Social choice (91B14) Voting theory (91B12)

Recommendations

• Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
• Judgment aggregation without full rationality
• Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation
• Consistent judgement aggregation: the truth-functional case
• Aggregation of binary evaluations for truth-functional agendas

Cites work

• A general extension theorem for binary relations
• A generalised model of judgment aggregation
• A possibility theorem on aggregation over multiple interconnected propositions
• Abstract Arrowian aggregation
• Aggregating sets of judgments: two impossibility results compared. With a comment by Isaac Levi
• Aggregation of binary evaluations
• Aggregation of binary evaluations for truth-functional agendas
• Aggregation of binary evaluations with abstentions
• Algebraic aggregation theory
• Arrow's theorem as a corollary
• Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation
• Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation
• Consistent judgement aggregation: the truth-functional case
• Democratic answers to complex questions -- an epistemic perspective
• Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation
• Geometric models of consistent judgement aggregation
• Judgment aggregation without full rationality
• Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
• Logical constraints on judgement aggregation
• Majority voting on restricted domains
• Merging Information Under Constraints: A Logical Framework
• Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation
• Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. I: General agendas
• The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation
• The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation

Cited in

(25)

• Abstract Arrowian aggregation
• Introduction to judgment aggregation
• The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation
• Many-valued judgment aggregation: characterizing the possibility/impossibility boundary
• Skill, value and remuneration in committees
• A general method for deciding about logically constrained issues
• Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. I: General agendas
• Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others
• Inequality of decision-makers' power and marginal contribution
• The Problem of Judgment Aggregation in the Framework of Boolean-Valued Models
• A partial taxonomy of judgment aggregation rules and their properties
• On the optimal composition of committees
• The possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implications
• A measure of distance between judgment sets
• Judgment aggregation in nonmonotonic logic
• Aggregation of binary evaluations for truth-functional agendas
• An Abstract Algebraic Logic View on Judgment Aggregation
• An application of simple majority rule to a group with an even number of voters
• Aggregating sets of judgments: two impossibility results compared. With a comment by Isaac Levi
• Is diversity in capabilities desirable when adding decision makers?
• A graph theoretical approach to decisions in social choice, law, A.I.
• Algorithmically efficient syntactic characterization of possibility domains
• Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation
• The model-theoretic approach to aggregation: impossibility results for finite and infinite electorates
• The unanimity rule and extremely asymmetric committees

This page was built for publication: Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2452241)