Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2452241
DOI10.1007/S00355-012-0661-7zbMATH Open1288.91065OpenAlexW2302812825MaRDI QIDQ2452241FDOQ2452241
Christian List, Franz Dietrich
Publication date: 2 June 2014
Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-012-0661-7
Recommendations
Cites Work
- Algebraic aggregation theory
- A possibility theorem on aggregation over multiple interconnected propositions
- Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation
- Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
- Democratic answers to complex questions -- an epistemic perspective
- A generalised model of judgment aggregation
- Aggregating sets of judgments: two impossibility results compared. With a comment by Isaac Levi
- Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation
- Logical constraints on judgement aggregation
- Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation
- Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation
- Abstract Arrowian aggregation
- Aggregation of binary evaluations
- The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation
- A general extension theorem for binary relations
- Judgment aggregation without full rationality
- Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. I: General agendas
- Arrow's theorem as a corollary
- Merging Information Under Constraints: A Logical Framework
- Majority voting on restricted domains
- Aggregation of binary evaluations with abstentions
- Geometric models of consistent judgement aggregation
- Consistent judgement aggregation: the truth-functional case
- Aggregation of binary evaluations for truth-functional agendas
- The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation
Cited In (20)
- Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others
- A graph theoretical approach to decisions in social choice, law, A.I.
- Aggregation of binary evaluations for truth-functional agendas
- An application of simple majority rule to a group with an even number of voters
- Aggregating sets of judgments: two impossibility results compared. With a comment by Isaac Levi
- Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. I: General agendas
- Inequality of decision-makers' power and marginal contribution
- Is diversity in capabilities desirable when adding decision makers?
- Abstract Arrowian aggregation
- Introduction to judgment aggregation
- Skill, value and remuneration in committees
- The unanimity rule and extremely asymmetric committees
- On the optimal composition of committees
- The model-theoretic approach to aggregation: impossibility results for finite and infinite electorates
- The Problem of Judgment Aggregation in the Framework of Boolean-Valued Models
- An Abstract Algebraic Logic View on Judgment Aggregation
- A general method for deciding about logically constrained issues
- A measure of distance between judgment sets
- Judgment aggregation in nonmonotonic logic
- Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation
This page was built for publication: Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2452241)
