A partial taxonomy of judgment aggregation rules and their properties

DOI10.1007/S00355-016-1006-8MaRDI QIDQ2397659zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Jérôme Lang, Gabriella Pigozzi, Marija Slavkovik, Leendert van der Torre, Srdjan Vesic

Publication date 23 May 2017

Published in Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.05888

zbMATH Keywords

judgment aggregation rules

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Social choice (91B14)

Abstract: The literature on judgment aggregation is moving from studying impossibility results regarding aggregation rules towards studying specific judgment aggregation rules. Here we give a structured list of most rules that have been proposed and studied recently in the literature, together with various properties of such rules. We first focus on the majority-preservation property, which generalizes Condorcet-consistency, and identify which of the rules satisfy it. We study the inclusion relationships that hold between the rules. Finally, we consider two forms of unanimity, monotonicity, homogeneity, and reinforcement, and we identify which of the rules satisfy these properties.

Recommendations

• Judgment aggregation rules and voting rules
• Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
• Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case
• Consistent judgement aggregation: the truth-functional case
• How hard is it to compute majority-preserving judgment aggregation rules?

Cites work

• A Complete Conclusion-Based Procedure for Judgment Aggregation
• A Consistent Extension of Condorcet’s Election Principle
• A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation
• A measure of distance between judgment sets
• Advances in knowledge representation, logic programming, and abstract argumentation. Essays dedicated to Gerhard Brewka on the occasion of his 60th birthday
• Aggregating sets of judgments: two impossibility results compared. With a comment by Isaac Levi
• Aggregation of binary evaluations: a Borda-like approach
• Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation
• Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation
• Complexity of judgment aggregation
• Control in judgment aggregation
• Extending Condorcet's rule
• Independence of clones as a criterion for voting rules
• Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation
• Judgment aggregation rules and voting rules
• Lifting integrity constraints in binary aggregation
• Majority rule in the absence of a majority
• Measuring dissimilarity between judgment sets
• Merging Information Under Constraints: A Logical Framework
• Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation
• Scoring rules for judgment aggregation
• The Condorcet set: majority voting over interconnected propositions
• The median rule in judgement aggregation
• The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation

Cited in

(14)

• The median rule in judgement aggregation
• Judgment aggregation rules and voting rules
• The Problem of Judgment Aggregation in the Framework of Boolean-Valued Models
• Local supermajorities
• An Abstract Algebraic Logic View on Judgment Aggregation
• Scoring rules for judgment aggregation
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2030522 (Why is no real title available?)
• Parameterized Complexity Results for the Kemeny Rule in Judgment Aggregation
• Aggregating probabilistic judgments
• The complexity landscape of outcome determination in judgment aggregation
• How hard is it to compute majority-preserving judgment aggregation rules?
• Collective combinatorial optimisation as judgment aggregation
• Declarative approaches to outcome determination in judgment aggregation
• Jérôme Lang's contributions at the interface of economic theory with artificial intelligence

This page was built for publication: A partial taxonomy of judgment aggregation rules and their properties

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2397659)