A measure of distance between judgment sets
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2450149
DOI10.1007/S00355-011-0565-YzbMATH Open1287.91063OpenAlexW2117074289MaRDI QIDQ2450149FDOQ2450149
Authors: Conal Duddy, Ashley Piggins
Publication date: 16 May 2014
Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-011-0565-y
Recommendations
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation
- Which worlds are possible? A judgment aggregation problem
- Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
- A generalised model of judgment aggregation
- A Consistent Extension of Condorcet’s Election Principle
- Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation
- Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation
- Introduction to judgment aggregation
- Abstract Arrowian aggregation
- Aggregation of binary evaluations
- The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation
- Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case
- Merging Information Under Constraints: A Logical Framework
- Many-valued judgment aggregation: characterizing the possibility/impossibility boundary
Cited In (16)
- The logic of group decisions: judgment aggregation
- A measure of utility levels by Euclidean distance.
- Scoring rules for judgment aggregation
- The complexity landscape of outcome determination in judgment aggregation
- Social choice rules driven by propositional logic
- Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation
- Measures of disagreement and aggregation of preferences based on multidistances
- Correction to: ``A distance measure for choice functions
- Judgment aggregation and minimal change: a model of consensus formation by belief revision
- A partial taxonomy of judgment aggregation rules and their properties
- Measuring dissimilarity between judgment sets
- The proximity condition
- Propositional distances and compact preference representation
- Modeling value disagreement
- Unanimity and the Anscombe's paradox
- Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation
This page was built for publication: A measure of distance between judgment sets
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2450149)