Which worlds are possible? A judgment aggregation problem

DOI10.1007/s10992-007-9058-yzbMath1133.91538OpenAlexW2019568097MaRDI QIDQ2481243

Christian List

Publication date: 9 April 2008

Published in: Journal of Philosophical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/5807/1/Which_worlds_are_possible_%28LSERO%29.pdf

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Models of societies, social and urban evolution (91D10) Social choice (91B14)

Related Items (4)

A measure of distance between judgment sets ⋮ Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation ⋮ NON-MANIPULABLE PARTITIONING ⋮ Aggregation of binary evaluations: a Borda-like approach

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Aggregating sets of judgments: two impossibility results compared. With a comment by Isaac Levi
• Logical constraints on judgement aggregation
• Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation
• Aggregation of binary evaluations
• Algebraic aggregation theory
• On the theory of aggregation
• Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation
• Axiomatizing collective judgment sets in a minimal logical language
• Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
• Democratic answers to complex questions -- an epistemic perspective
• The limits of epistemic democracy
• A generalised model of judgment aggregation

This page was built for publication: Which worlds are possible? A judgment aggregation problem