Axiomatizing collective judgment sets in a minimal logical language
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2460184
Recommendations
Cites work
- A Characterization of Weighted Voting
- A Set of Independent Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Simple Majority Decision
- Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3670430 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1357433 (Why is no real title available?)
- Logical constraints on judgement aggregation
Cited in
(11)- The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory
- Logic and majority voting
- A simple logic for reasoning about incomplete knowledge
- Which worlds are possible? A judgment aggregation problem
- Social choice and the logic of simple games
- A Simple Modal Logic for Reasoning about Revealed Beliefs
- Judgement aggregation in non-classical logics
- Aggregating sets of judgments: two impossibility results compared. With a comment by Isaac Levi
- Reasoning about collectively accepted group beliefs
- On the role of language in social choice theory
- Ranking judgments in Arrow's setting
This page was built for publication: Axiomatizing collective judgment sets in a minimal logical language
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2460184)