Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2460083
This paper studies collective judgment. Impossibility theorems on judgment aggregation are proven. An embedding of preference aggregation into judgment aggregation is constructed. It allows deriving Arrow's Theorem from the impossibility results proven in the judgment aggregation context.
Recommendations
Cites work
- A possibility theorem on aggregation over multiple interconnected propositions
- Aggregating sets of judgments: two impossibility results compared. With a comment by Isaac Levi
- Aggregation of binary evaluations
- Arrow's theorem as a corollary
- Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation
- Democratic answers to complex questions -- an epistemic perspective
- Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
- Logical constraints on judgement aggregation
- On the theory of aggregation
- The probability of inconsistencies in complex collective decisions
Cited in
(92)- Majority merging by adaptive counting
- Geometric models of consistent judgement aggregation
- Calculus and extensions of Arrow's theorem
- Collective judgement: combining individual value judgements
- The birth of social choice theory from the spirit of mathematical logic: Arrow's theorem in the framework of model theory
- Arrovian aggregation of generalised expected-utility preferences: (im)possibility results by means of model theory
- Natural deduction for modal logic of judgment aggregation
- Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. I: General agendas
- Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. II: The premise-based approach
- Judgments aggregation by a sequential majority procedure
- A possibility theorem on aggregation over multiple interconnected propositions
- Preference profiles sustaining Arrow's theorem
- Welfarist-consequentialism, similarity of attitudes, and Arrow's general impossibility theorem
- Arrow's theorem as a corollary
- The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory
- Aggregation of non-binary evaluations
- Judgment aggregation in nonmonotonic logic
- The rarity of consistent aggregators
- An Arrovian impossibility in combining ranking and evaluation
- Strategic manipulation in judgment aggregation under higher-level reasoning
- Logic and majority voting
- Arrow's decisive coalitions
- A bias aggregation theorem
- Neutrality and relative acceptability in judgment aggregation
- The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation
- Aggregation of binary evaluations for truth-functional agendas
- Strategyproof judgment aggregation under partial information
- Connecting and resolving Sen's and Arrow's theorems
- A partial taxonomy of judgment aggregation rules and their properties
- Preferences over procedures and outcomes in judgment aggregation: an experimental study
- Arrovian impossibilities in aggregating preferences over non-resolute outcomes
- Approximately classic judgement aggregation
- An impossibility theorem for amalgamating evidence
- Lifting integrity constraints in binary aggregation
- A measure of distance between judgment sets
- Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case
- Axiomatizing collective judgment sets in a minimal logical language
- Reaching a consensus
- Which worlds are possible? A judgment aggregation problem
- Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
- A positional version of Arrow's theorem
- Aggregation of binary evaluations: a Borda-like approach
- The logic of group decisions: judgment aggregation
- The doctrinal paradox: comparison of decision rules in a probabilistic framework
- A comment on Arrow's impossibility theorem
- Arrowian social equilibrium: indecisiveness, influence and rational social choices under majority rule
- Bounded response of aggregated preferences
- Guilbaud's 1952 theorem on the logical problem of aggregation
- Introduction to judgment aggregation
- The consistency of majority rule
- A General Approach to Aggregation Problems
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3930803 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4087371 (Why is no real title available?)
- The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review
- Judgment aggregation and the problem of tracking the truth
- Scoring rules for judgment aggregation
- Impossibility results for infinite-electorate abstract aggregation rules
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1143643 (Why is no real title available?)
- Belief merging and judgment aggregation in fuzzy setting
- The model-theoretic approach to aggregation: impossibility results for finite and infinite electorates
- Arrow's theorem and theory choice
- Judgment aggregation in search for the truth
- The judgment and characteristic of the back projection of social choice function aggregation
- Social choice methods for database aggregation
- Algorithmically efficient syntactic characterization of possibility domains
- The complexity landscape of outcome determination in judgment aggregation
- Graph aggregation
- Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation
- A graph theoretical approach to decisions in social choice, law, A.I.
- A phase transition in Arrow's theorem with three alternatives
- A general framework for participatory budgeting with additional constraints
- Dynamically rational judgment aggregation
- Declarative approaches to outcome determination in judgment aggregation
- Aggregation of evaluations without unanimity
- Filters in abstract aggregation with infinite sequences of signals
- Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation
- Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation
- Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others
- Judgment aggregation without full rationality
- A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation
- Decision framing in judgment aggregation
- Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation
- Introduction to judgment aggregation
- Abstract Arrowian aggregation
- Aggregation of binary evaluations
- Majority voting on restricted domains
- Aggregation of binary evaluations with abstentions
- The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation
- Justifiable group choice
- The possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implications
- A quantitative discursive dilemma
- Ranking judgments in Arrow's setting
This page was built for publication: Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2460083)
