Aggregation of binary evaluations for truth-functional agendas

DOI10.1007/s00355-008-0320-1zbMath1170.91011OpenAlexW2158885396MaRDI QIDQ2272183

Ron Holzman, Elad Dokow

Publication date: 6 August 2009

Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-008-0320-1

zbMATH Keywords

judgment aggregationArrow's theoremPareto condition

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Group preferences (91B10)

Related Items (16)

The problem of no hands: responsibility voids in collective decisions ⋮ A paradox of expert rights in abstract argumentation ⋮ The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory ⋮ Approximately classic judgement aggregation ⋮ Incoherent majorities: the McGarvey problem in judgement aggregation ⋮ Neutrality and relative acceptability in judgment aggregation ⋮ Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case ⋮ On the Computational Complexity of Non-Dictatorial Aggregation ⋮ Introduction to judgment aggregation ⋮ Abstract Arrowian aggregation ⋮ Aggregation of binary evaluations ⋮ The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation ⋮ Justifiable group choice ⋮ Unnamed Item ⋮ Unnamed Item ⋮ Strategyproof judgment aggregation under partial information

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Logical constraints on judgement aggregation
• Consistent judgement aggregation: the truth-functional case
• Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation
• Aggregation of binary evaluations with abstentions
• Aggregation of equivalence relations
• Algebraic aggregation theory
• On the theory of aggregation
• Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation
• A generalised model of judgment aggregation

This page was built for publication: Aggregation of binary evaluations for truth-functional agendas