Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others
DOI10.1016/J.JET.2015.03.012zbMATH Open1369.91053OpenAlexW2095676952MaRDI QIDQ893423FDOQ893423
Authors: Franz Dietrich
Publication date: 19 November 2015
Published in: Journal of Economic Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/en/publications/6679aa1a-fa71-4c15-a359-8292f302e0dd
Recommendations
judgment aggregationpriority graphaggregation of non-binary evaluationsgeneralized Arrow theoremgeneralized premise-based and sequential-priority rules
Cites Work
- Algebraic aggregation theory
- On the theory of aggregation
- Aggregation of non-binary evaluations
- Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation
- Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
- A generalised model of judgment aggregation
- Reliable methods of judgement aggregation
- Scoring rules for judgment aggregation
- Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation
- Logical constraints on judgement aggregation
- Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation
- Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation
- Abstract Arrowian aggregation
- Aggregation of binary evaluations
- The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation
- Combining probability distributions: A critique and an annotated bibliography
- Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case
- Judgment aggregation without full rationality
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Arrow's theorem as a corollary
- Merging Information Under Constraints: A Logical Framework
- Aggregation of binary evaluations with abstentions
- The Condorcet set: majority voting over interconnected propositions
- Consistent judgement aggregation: the truth-functional case
- Majority judgment. Measuring, ranking, and electing.
- Many-valued judgment aggregation: characterizing the possibility/impossibility boundary
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- A quantitative discursive dilemma
Cited In (10)
- On update monotone, continuous, and consistent collective evaluation rules
- Neutrality and relative acceptability in judgment aggregation
- The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review
- Judgments aggregation by a sequential majority procedure
- Ranking judgments in Arrow's setting
- The median rule in judgement aggregation
- Judgement aggregation in non-classical logics
- An Arrovian impossibility in combining ranking and evaluation
- Classification aggregation without unanimity
- Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation
This page was built for publication: Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q893423)