Logical constraints on judgement aggregation

From MaRDI portal
Publication:853812

DOI10.1007/s10992-005-9011-xzbMath1108.03009OpenAlexW2060612256MaRDI QIDQ853812

Marc Pauly, van Hees, Martin

Publication date: 17 November 2006

Published in: Journal of Philosophical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://pure.rug.nl/ws/files/9850537/journalphillogic.pdf




Related Items (46)

The logic of group decisions: judgment aggregationLogic and majority votingOn update monotone, continuous, and consistent collective evaluation rulesIntroduction to Judgment AggregationThe limits of epistemic democracyA generalised model of judgment aggregationBelief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregationRepresenting voting rules in Łukasiewicz’s three-valued logicThe theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory reviewDynamic doxastic logic: why, how, and where to?The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theoryAggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to othersThe joint aggregation of beliefs and degrees of beliefProbabilistic opinion pooling generalized. I: General agendasThe model-theoretic approach to aggregation: impossibility results for finite and infinite electoratesAggregation of non-binary evaluationsNeutrality and relative acceptability in judgment aggregationPropositionwise judgment aggregation: the general caseJudgment aggregation without full rationalityConsistent judgement aggregation: the truth-functional caseA liberal paradox for judgment aggregationThe Complexity Landscape of Outcome Determination in Judgment AggregationFactoring out the impossibility of logical aggregationArrow's theorem in judgment aggregationAxiomatizing collective judgment sets in a minimal logical languageFormal methods in the philosophy of scienceRepresentative Committees of PeersJudgment aggregation in nonmonotonic logicLogical Opposition and Collective DecisionsWhich worlds are possible? A judgment aggregation problemIntroduction to judgment aggregationAggregation of binary evaluationsMajority voting on restricted domainsAggregation of binary evaluations with abstentionsThe premiss-based approach to judgment aggregationJustifiable group choiceThe possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implicationsOn the dynamics of institutional agreementsJudgment aggregation: (im)possibility theoremsThe impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregationThe rarity of consistent aggregatorsAggregation of binary evaluations for truth-functional agendasRanking judgments in Arrow's settingJudgment aggregation and agenda manipulationMethods for distance-based judgment aggregationPremise-based vs conclusion-based collective choice



Cites Work


This page was built for publication: Logical constraints on judgement aggregation