Logical constraints on judgement aggregation
From MaRDI portal
Publication:853812
DOI10.1007/S10992-005-9011-XzbMATH Open1108.03009OpenAlexW2060612256MaRDI QIDQ853812FDOQ853812
Authors: Marc Pauly, Martin Van Hees 
Publication date: 17 November 2006
Published in: Journal of Philosophical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://pure.rug.nl/ws/files/9850537/journalphillogic.pdf
Recommendations
- The logic of group decisions: judgment aggregation
- Logical disagreement and aggregation
- The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory
- A generalised model of judgment aggregation
- Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation
Decision theory (91B06) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)
Cites Work
Cited In (52)
- Logical disagreement and aggregation
- Representing voting rules in Łukasiewicz's three-valued logic
- Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others
- On update monotone, continuous, and consistent collective evaluation rules
- A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation
- Aggregation of binary evaluations with abstentions
- Majority voting on restricted domains
- Neutrality and relative acceptability in judgment aggregation
- The logic of group decisions: judgment aggregation
- The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review
- The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation
- Aggregation of binary evaluations for truth-functional agendas
- The complexity landscape of outcome determination in judgment aggregation
- Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. I: General agendas
- Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation
- Logic aggregation
- Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation
- Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation
- Introduction to judgment aggregation
- Aggregation of binary evaluations
- Introduction to judgment aggregation
- Justifiable group choice
- On the dynamics of institutional agreements
- The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation
- Ranking judgments in Arrow's setting
- The possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implications
- Dynamic doxastic logic: why, how, and where to?
- The rarity of consistent aggregators
- Judgement aggregation in non-classical logics
- Belief merging and judgment aggregation in fuzzy setting
- The model-theoretic approach to aggregation: impossibility results for finite and infinite electorates
- The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory
- Aggregation of non-binary evaluations
- Logical opposition and collective decisions
- Judgment aggregation without full rationality
- Logic and majority voting
- An Abstract Algebraic Logic View on Judgment Aggregation
- Formal methods in the philosophy of science
- A general method for deciding about logically constrained issues
- Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation
- Which worlds are possible? A judgment aggregation problem
- Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
- A generalised model of judgment aggregation
- Premise-based vs conclusion-based collective choice
- Consistent judgement aggregation: the truth-functional case
- Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case
- The joint aggregation of beliefs and degrees of belief
- Judgment aggregation in nonmonotonic logic
- The limits of epistemic democracy
- Representative committees of peers
- Axiomatizing collective judgment sets in a minimal logical language
- Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation
This page was built for publication: Logical constraints on judgement aggregation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q853812)
