A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation

DOI10.1007/S00355-007-0263-YMaRDI QIDQ930479zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Franz Dietrich, Christian List

Publication date 30 June 2008

Published in Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/5802/1/A_liberal_paradox_for_judgment_aggregation_%28LSERO%29.pdf

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Social choice (91B14)

Recommendations

• Respect for experts vs. respect for unanimity: the liberal paradox in probabilistic opinion pooling
• A paradox of expert rights in abstract argumentation
• Consistent rights on property spaces
• Justice, liberty, unanimity and the axioms of identity
• Rights and the liberal paradoxes

Cites work

• A generalised model of judgment aggregation
• A possibility theorem on aggregation over multiple interconnected propositions
• Aggregating sets of judgments: two impossibility results compared. With a comment by Isaac Levi
• Algebraic aggregation theory
• Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation
• Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation
• Conditional desirability
• Consistent judgement aggregation: the truth-functional case
• Democratic answers to complex questions -- an epistemic perspective
• Freedom of choice and diversity of options: some difficulties
• Game forms, rights, and the efficiency of social outcomes
• Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
• Liberal Values and Independence
• Liberalism and individual preferences
• Liberalism, efficiency, and stability: Some possibility results
• Logical constraints on judgement aggregation
• Merging Information Under Constraints: A Logical Framework
• On the theory of aggregation
• The limits of epistemic democracy
• The possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implications
• The probability of inconsistencies in complex collective decisions

Cited in

(13)

• Introduction to judgment aggregation
• Reaching a consensus
• A paradox of expert rights in abstract argumentation
• Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation
• A partial taxonomy of judgment aggregation rules and their properties
• The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation
• Consistent rights on property spaces
• Respect for experts vs. respect for unanimity: the liberal paradox in probabilistic opinion pooling
• A generalised model of judgment aggregation
• The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review
• The rarity of consistent aggregators
• Sen cycles and externalities
• The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory

This page was built for publication: A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q930479)