Game forms, rights, and the efficiency of social outcomes

DOI10.1006/JETH.1996.2201zbMATH Open0883.90006OpenAlexW1979596441MaRDI QIDQ1363525FDOQ1363525

Authors Prasanta K. Pattanaik, Laura Razzolini, R. Deb 

Publication date 10 August 1997

Published in Journal of Economic Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.1996.2201

zbMATH Keywords

game formSen's familiar paradox of the Paretian liberal

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Social choice (91B14) Other game-theoretic models (91A40)

Recommendations

• Effectivity functions, game forms, games, and rights
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 910770
• On rights in game forms
• Rights as alternative game forms
• Social choice and the logic of simple games
• Socially subjective equilibrium in strategic form games
• Marginalism, egalitarianism and efficiency in multi-choice games
• Game forms for Nash implementation of general social choice correspondences
• Egalitarianism and efficiency in repeated symmetric games
• Equilibria of the games in choice form

Cited in

(21)

• Between liberalism and democracy.
• Effectivity Functions and Acceptable Game Forms
• The representation of alienable and inalienable rights: Games in transition function form
• Separable discrete functions: recognition and sufficient conditions
• On the meta-strategic inconsistency of a Paretian liberal
• A paradox of expert rights in abstract argumentation
• Rights as alternative game forms
• Nash consistent representation of constitutions: A reaction to the Gibbard paradox.
• A general impossibility theorem and its application to individual rights
• On the strategic inconsistency of the meta-rights approach
• Daunou's voting rule and the lexicographic assignment of priorities
• A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation
• Consistent rights on property spaces
• A trade-off result for preference revelation
• Pareto efficiency with spatial rights
• Liberalism, efficiency, and stability: Some possibility results
• Freedom of choice in a social context: comparing game forms
• Representation of effectivity functions by acceptable game forms: a complete characterization
• An axiomatic approach to predictability of outcomes in an interactive setting
• On rights in game forms
• Individual powers and social consent: an axiomatic approach

This page was built for publication: Game forms, rights, and the efficiency of social outcomes

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1363525)